Skip to content

Portrait of Beethoven by Scott Gentling
Scott Gentling (1942-2011).Beethoven.[undated].Graphite on paper.Amon Carter Museum of American Art, Fort Worth, Texas.2018.70, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons

Beethoven, one of the great musical geniuses of the 19th century, was deaf when he wrote some of his best known works. He had progressive hearing loss starting in his 20’s and was functionally deaf during his late period when he wrote his most expressive and innovative sonatas, string quartets, and the Ninth Symphony (Ode to Joy). Beethoven also suffered from gastrointestinal symptoms most of his adult life and died of liver failure. In 1802, he requested that his medical conditions be disclosed to the public after his death in a letter to his brothers known as the Heiligenstadt Testament.

Historians and musicologists have speculated if he had a heritable disorder or infectious disease that contributed to his hearing loss and death. Alcoholism was suspected as a factor in his liver disease. There was a family history of alcohol dependence and some of his associates claimed he drank heavily, though others said he did not drink more than was typical at that time.

Recent advances in ancient DNA methods presented an opportunity to learn more about Beethoven’s medical conditions. A team of 32 international researchers used eight surviving locks of Beethoven’s hair for their analysis. Several locks were taken by friends when Beethoven died in 1827 and others were given to friends and associates while he was alive.  Over the years they were sold and passed down to others and the provenance of some were questionable. The locks were analyzed in this new study to determine their authenticity, using a novel geo-genetic triangulation technique. Additionally, the researchers “analyzed Beethoven’s genome for genetic causes of and risk for somatic disorders in addition to metagenomic screening for evidence of infections, followed by targeted DNA capture.” (Begg, et al, 2023)

Five of the locks were determined to originate from a single individual or monozygotic twins and had damage patterns that authenticated them for early 19th century origin. A non-matching lock called the Hiller lock was used in previous genetic and forensic testing featured in the book and movie, Beethoven’s Hair. It was found to be from a woman, invalidating results indicating lead poisoning as a contributor to Beethoven’s hearing loss and other maladies.

Analysis on the Y chromosome revealed a surprise finding. Five living men from the Beethoven patrilineage had a common ancestor in Aert van Beethoven (1535-1609). But their Y chromosomes did not match with any of the five authenticated Beethoven hair samples. The researchers conclude that there was at least one extra pair paternity event in Beethoven’s ancestry. Further analysis of descendants of Beethoven’s brother Karl leaves open the possibility that the two may have been half brothers.

Beethoven’s GI symptoms were consistent with Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis. His hearing loss could have been associated. Other possible related causes for the hearing loss were otosclerosis, sarcoidosis or systemic lupus erythematosus. A genome wide association study eliminated most of these as possibilities, except for lupus where there was some elevated polygenic risk. 

Celiac disease and lactose intolerance were both eliminated as possible causes of his gastrointestinal symptoms through testing for associated alleles. He actually had some elevated genetic protections against irritable bowel syndrome, making it also unlikely. 

They analyzed 55 genes where variants could cause monogenic post-lingual hearing loss and 209 related to pre-lingual hearing loss. There were no positive findings.

In summary, we could not reliably evaluate most hypothesized multifactorial causes of Beethoven’s hearing loss, nor did we identify a monogenic origin.”

(Begg, et al, 2023)

Beethoven’s polygenic risk for liver cirrhosis was found to be elevated in his PNPLA3 gene and his HFE gene. This combined with heavy drinking could have caused his liver failure. Additionally, hepatitis B DNA was found in the Stumpff Lock hair which was the best preserved sample. Researchers could not tell how long he’d had the hepatitis B infection. The positive lock was taken at his death and represented the final months of his life. Tristan Begg, the lead author of the study, wrote more about the possible role of hepatitis B in Beethoven’s liver failure on William Meredith’s blog. Meredith is a Beethoven scholar who participated in the genome study.

Though not addressed directly in the paper, the study brings to an end the theory that Beethoven was black. Noting the similarities in their appearance, the bi-racial composer Samuel Coleridge-Taylor was the first to raise the possibility. Many contemporaries of Beethoven described him as dark, brown or ruddy in complexion and noted his broad, rounded nose which can be seen in his life mask taken in 1812. The idea has persisted since Coleridge-Taylor introduced it, and was repeated by Malcolm X and a 1969 Rolling Stones article titled “Beethoven was black and proud!” More recently it was the subject of scholarly articles and even a Twitter meme. This genomic analysis confirms that Beethoven’s ancestry was greater than 99% European, with the strongest autosomal match with present day North Rhine-Westphalia in Germany.

Although there was no definitive finding on Beethoven’s hearing loss, there was plenty to advance the existing knowledge base and establish leads for future research. The study demonstrates how much can be learned from a few strands of centuries old hair through new genetic analysis tools.

References

Begg TJA, Schmidt A, Kocher A, et al. Genomic analyses of hair from Ludwig van Beethoven. Curr Biol. 2023 Apr 24;33(8):1431-1447.e22. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2023.02.041. Epub 2023 Mar 22. PMID: 36958333.

Clark P. ‘Beethoven was black’: why the radical idea still has power today. The Guardian. 7 Sep 2020. https://www.theguardian.com/music/2020/sep/07/beethoven-was-black-why-the-radical-idea-still-has-power-today

Jewish American Heritage Month dates to 2006 when it was first proclaimed by then President George W Bush in reflection of the 350th anniversary of Jews first arriving in America.  A group of 23 Sephardic Jews fled persecution in Dutch Brazil during the Portuguese Inquisition and arrived in New Amsterdam (now New York) in 1654.

Since then the Jewish community has been an important contributor to American culture and prosperity, including many discoveries and advances in medicine. These were achieved despite barriers to becoming health professionals that existed well into the 20th century. Limited quotas for Jewish enrollment were quietly instituted in medical schools and post-graduate training in the 1920’s and there is evidence that the quotas continued until the 1950s. 

The quotas were in response to a wave of immigration by Russian and Eastern European Jews from the 1880s to 1920. Many of these immigrants and their children pursued medical training, due to their high esteem for medicine as a profession and the pathway it provided to a middle class life in America.  The number of Jewish physicians who graduated from medical colleges in 10 major US cities increased from 7 in 1875-1880 to 2,313 in 1931-35. 

Following World War I,  the rise of nativism and anti-Semitism in the United States was reflected in the growth of organizations like the Ku Klux Klan and anti-immigrant groups.  Russian and Eastern European Jews were particularly discriminated against due to prejudice about their culture, countries of origin and suspected revolutionary ideologies, as well as their religion. The institutions that Jewish medical students were entering were largely private, Protestant universities and colleges and there was growing pressure to keep their numbers down, resulting in both official and unacknowledged quotas. 

“In an era in which it was estimated that 32-50% of U.S. medical school applicants were Jews, the medical historian Henry Sigerist wrote that “Jewish students are subject to a tacit, but nevertheless highly effective, quota-system and in most schools the number of Jewish students rarely exceeds 10 per cent. …”

(Halperin, 2019)

The president of Harvard in the 1920s, A. Lawrence Lowell, was a member of the Immigration Restriction League and openly endorsed admission quotas. Columbia and Yale both had explicit quotas starting in 1918 and 1920. At Yale, the admissions committee was to admit no more than 5 Jewish students per medical class.  The University of Michigan began requiring interviews for entry to medical school in the late 1920s and subsequently rejected many Jewish applicants based on their personalities.  Many schools also required disclosure of religion and family background on applications.

“A 1946 review of thirty-nine U.S. medical school application forms showed that all asked the applicant’s religious preference or affiliation, ten asked for the religion of the applicant’s parents, fifteen asked the parents’ race, and eleven inquired if the family name had ever been changed.”

(Halperin, 2001)

As the Second World War ended, attitudes began to change and there was increased sympathy for the Jewish community and Holocaust survivors in the US. Jewish associations worked to enact anti-discriminatory education policies and had the support of President Truman’s Commission on Higher Education. The state of New York and city of Philadelphia both launched investigations into the quota system, exposing it to the public. New York’s Hart Report found that Jews, African-Americans and Italian Roman Catholics were selectively denied admission to the medical schools at Cornell and Columbia. The State University of New York system was founded in the wake of the Hart report, creating new public medical schools in the state.  Several Jewish medical schools were established in the 1950s including Albert Einstein Medical College and Mt Sinai School of Medicine. 

The AMA and AAMC did little to investigate or condemn the quota system. In 1947 when the two organizations published findings of a survey of medical schools, they defended the practice of asking questions about race, religion and family background on applications and opposed anti-discriminatory policies saying they would interfere with school’s freedom to select students “who will most advance the quality of medical education.” 

Despite all of these challenges, the achievements of Jewish physicians and medical researchers in the 20th century are remarkable. We can thank them for the polio and hepatitis b vaccines, the invention of Novocain and streptomycin, pioneering surgical procedures, and important genetic advances.  See this Wikipedia entry for a list of the many Jewish American Nobel laureates in Physiology and Medicine.

References

Halperin E. (2001) The Jewish Problem in U.S. Medical Education, 1920–1955, Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, 56(2), 140–167. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhmas/56.2.140

Halperin E. (2019). Why Did the United States Medical School Admissions Quota for Jews End? The American Journal of the Medical Sciences, 358(5), 317–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjms.2019.08.005

Sokoloff L. (1992). The rise and decline of the Jewish quota in medical school admissions. Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 68(4), 497–518.

Healthcare professional with stethoscope holding smart phone image by Ivan Samkov on Pexels
Photo by Ivan Samkov on Pexels: https://www.pexels.com/photo/a-man-in-medical-gown-using-a-smartphone-4989177/

Himmelfarb Library offers a couple of apps to help stay current with health sciences literature. Browzine is an e-journals app that allows users to follow publications the library subscribes to.  Search by title, ISSN, or subject to find your favorite journals and then set up a personal bookshelf for easy access to table of contents and full-text, or have table of contents sent to you via a notification feature when new issues are available. Browzine integrates with Zotero, Mendeley, and RefWorks to help you organize (and cite!) the articles you read. You can also download full-text for offline reading. Set up a free account by accessing Browzine and selecting My BookShelf.  You can download the app from the Apple and Google app stores.

Read by QxMD is another app that allows you to follow specific health sciences journals or subject areas.  Read is like a social media app that will tailor your feed based on what you like or follow. The primary content source for Read is PubMed and new articles become available in Read as they are added to the PubMed database. Read recently began including preprint content from medRxiv, bioRxiv, and Research Square. Note that there is some sponsored content on Read which is highlighted and identified as promoted. 

Read recently introduced 2 Minute Medicine Collections that feature a brief synopsis of newly published articles in a specialty. Each article’s level of evidence is indicated. 

Screenshots of Read by QxMD 2 Minute Medicine collections and article summary.
Read by QxMD 2 Minute Medicine Collections and Summary

Read is a current awareness tool that relies on keyword searching and algorithms for article retrieval.  It is not recommended for in depth research or finding the best evidence for patient care. For complex queries that need regular update, consider setting up a database alert from PubMed or Scopus.  Instructions for setting up an alert are on the Keeping Up with Health Sciences Information Research Guide, or reach out to our reference team at himmelfarb@gwu.edu or library chat for assistance.

Download the Read app for either Apple or Android devices and set up a free account. Choosing George Washington University as your institution will provide access to Himmelfarb Library subscription full-text as well as open access content. Once your account is set up you can choose to follow topics based on keyword search, specialty, specific journals, or curated collections. You can also set up your own collections and opt to share them.

In 2021, UNESCO developed a Recommendation on Open Science to be adopted by member states. This recommendation evolved from a 2017 Recommendation on Science and Scientific Researchers promoting science as a common good. 

UNESCO’s Recommendation on Science and Scientific Researchers, https://youtu.be/94T7NGirUlM

The Recommendation on Open Science includes a definition of open science:

Open science is … an inclusive construct that combines various movements and practices aiming to make multilingual scientific knowledge openly available, accessible and reusable for everyone, to increase scientific collaborations and sharing of information for the benefits of science and society, and to open the processes of scientific knowledge creation, evaluation and communication to societal actors beyond the traditional scientific community. It comprises all scientific disciplines and aspects of scholarly practices, including basic and applied sciences, natural and social sciences and the humanities, and it builds on the following key pillars: open scientific knowledge, open science infrastructures, science communication, open engagement of societal actors and open dialogue with other knowledge systems.

(UNESCO, 2021.)

The recommendation calls for scientific publications, research data, software and source code to be open and available to scientists internationally. The NIH adopted an open access policy for manuscripts resulting from funded research in 2008. Early this year the NIH adopted a policy requiring that all newly funded grants include a data management and sharing plan to make the underlying research data freely available to other researchers.  For more information on the data sharing policy and how to comply, explore our Research Guide.

Platforms that support the sharing and dissemination of research findings and their underlying data are becoming available. The Open Science Framework (OSF) is a “free, open platform to support your research and enable collaboration”. It provides tools to design a study, collect and analyze data, and publish and share results. OSF was designed and is maintained by the non-profit Center for Open Science. 

A helpful feature of OSF is the ability to generate a unique, persistent URL (uniform resource locator) for a project for sharing and attribution. There is also built-in version control and collaborators can be assigned a hierarchical level of permissions for data and document management. Researchers can decide to make all or parts of a project public and searchable and add licensing. Public projects can be searched on the OSF site. Registering a project creates a timestamped version for preservation. Pre-prints can also be hosted and made available for searching.

OSF has integrations with a number of useful tools including storage add-ons like Amazon S3, Google Drive, DropBox and figshare. Zotero and Mendeley can be integrated for citation management and GitHub can be used for managing software and code. 

Institutions can set up a custom landing page for OSF and build user communities to promote sharing and collaboration within the institution and beyond. Harvard, Johns Hopkins, and NYU are among the many research universities that are using OSF in this way.

Last month Nature and Code Ocean announced a partnership to launch and curate Open Science Library. The Open Science Library contains research software used in Nature journal articles. “Compute capsules” which include the code, data, and computing environment will allow researchers to reproduce results, re-use the code, and collaborate. As open science becomes the norm, more multifunction platforms that enhance sharing and reproducibility while preserving work and ensuring attribution will continue to emerge.

References:

UNESCO. (2021). UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379949.locale=en

UNESCO. (2017). Consolidated Report on the Implementation by Member States of the 2017 Recommendation on Science and Scientific Researchers. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379704

Foster, E. D., & Deardorff, A. (2017). Open Science Framework (OSF). Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 105(2), 203–206. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2017.88

Code Ocean. (2023). Code Ocean Partners with Nature Portfolio to Launch the Open Science Library with Ready-to-Run Software from Authors in Nature Journals (Press Release). https://codeocean.com/press-release/code-ocean-partners-with-nature-portfolio-open-science-library/

LibKey Nomad is a free browser plug-in that will alert you to the availability of full-text content from Himmelfarb Library and provide buttons to immediately download a PDF version or view the content on the publisher site. Previously Nomad only worked for scholarly articles. Now Nomad also works for e-books! 

Screenshot of a LibKey Nomad alert and link in a publisher site to an e-book in Himmelfarb Library's collections.
LibKey Nomad alert and link for a Himmelfarb Library e-book in a publisher website.

When Himmelfarb has the e-book, LibKey Nomad will alert you when viewing books on Amazon, Google Books and publisher websites including Wiley, Elsevier, Cambridge, Thieme, Wolters-Kluwer, Springer, SAGE, Taylor and Francis and many others. If you need a book for academic, patient care, research or personal needs, LibKey Nomad will pop up with a notification and a link if you already have access to it for free from the library.  

LibKey Nomad works in a variety of web browsers (Chrome, Firefox, Edge, Safari, Vivaldi) and websites. If you’re searching Scopus, Google Scholar, PubMed, Web of Science and even Wikipedia, LibKey Nomad integrates full-text access directly from where you find the content. LibKey Nomad will even tell you if an article has been retracted

To use LibKey Nomad, install it as a browser plug-in and choose ‘George Washington University - Himmelfarb Library’ as your home library when prompted. If you already have it installed, you will now be alerted to e-book content when searching.

Have questions about Nomad or other ways to find and view full-text content? Contact Himmelfarb’s Information desk at himmelfarb@gwu.edu or chat with us during business hours.

GW Medical Student Research Day is scheduled for Wednesday, April 26, 2023 as a live in-person event at the University Student Center. There will be a plenary speaker and students will have an opportunity to share their research projects with a poster and oral presentation. Videos of past poster presentations are available on our Research Guide and YouTube channel.

Research poster abstract checklist image and March 1st submission due date

Poster abstracts for Medical Student Research Day 2023 will be due on March 1st, a week from today! If you’re just starting to put an abstract together, or putting on the finishing touches, Himmelfarb Library has resources to help. 

You can find much of what you need on our Research Day Resources: Writing Abstracts page. The guide outlines the basic components of a scientific abstract and provides both recommendations and examples for producing a quality abstract. 

If you need more help you can chat our reference librarians or make an appointment with the GW Writing Center. The Writing Center now has Thursday hours from 6-8pm at Himmelfarb Library. We recommend scheduling an appointment in advance by calling 202-994-3765. 

If your poster abstract is accepted, congratulations! Come back to our GW Research Day Resources Research Guide for valuable information and tips for designing a winning poster and presenting it effectively.

This semester Himmelfarb Library welcomes back the GW Writing Center! We are gratified to be able to host this valuable service and make it more convenient for the health sciences community to get feedback and support to improve their writing.

Image of GW Writing Center banner and consulting space in Himmelfarb Library
GW Writing Center consulting space on Himmelfarb Library's first floor.

Starting February 16th, the Writing Center will have a consultant available Thursdays from 6-8pm on Himmelfarb Library’s first floor. To book an appointment, call 202-994-3765 during Writing Center operating hours.  They also welcome drop ins!

The Writing Center provides assistance with a variety of writing needs including research reports, speeches, group project reports, cover letters and CVs, and even written take-home exams if the professor permits. Services are provided by student consultants. Consultants who specialize in public health and STEM writing, or have expertise in APA citation style, can be found here. Some appointment preparation is encouraged prior to consulting sessions.

Himmelfarb Library can help you with bibliography formatting and citation style. We have Research Guides on APA and AMA citation style format with all the information you need in one place, including example citations for all material formats. We can also assist you with the use of citation managers like RefWorks. You can reach out to our reference librarians via Chat or by emailing himmelfarb@gwu.edu for direct assistance if required.

Find other resources on scientific writing in our collection.

Using 3D printed models is becoming increasingly common for both surgical procedures planning and surgical training. Three dimensional models can help surgeons develop surgical plans by providing better visualization and understanding of the anatomical structures than CT or other imaging alone. In training, 3D printed surgical simulators can have advantages over other methods, such as cadavers, animal models, or virtual reality training.

Image of surgical team with 3D printed skull
Image by Formlabs, Inc on Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/161389331@N04/46066892645

To create a 3D model for surgical planning, imaging studies are converted to a file type that can be rendered as a 3D object. The file is edited to exclude unwanted structures and printed. A recent meta-analysis (Yammine, 2022) of 13 randomized controlled trials found that operative duration, intraoperative blood loss and fluoroscopy use were improved for those that used 3D models for surgical planning of fracture management and the rates of excellent/good overall results and anatomic fracture reduction were significantly higher.  

A randomized controlled trial published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders (Zhang, 2022)  compared the outcomes of clavicular fracture repair by experienced and inexperienced surgeons using 3D printing or just CT scans. The authors were particularly interested in how the findings could be applied in low and middle income country settings where surgeons may have limited skills and experience. 3D printing has become more accessible due to lower costs of printers and media. In this study, the average cost of the clavicle model was just $.84. The research team considered operation time, blood loss, length of incision, and intraoperative fluoroscopy use to measure success.  Findings showed little difference in the performance of experienced surgeons, but inexperienced surgeons performed better with 3D models with reduced incision length and intraoperative exposure.

“Since 3D printing models could provide a visual, comprehensive vision of fracture, the position of plate implantation, screw direction, and screw length can be determined in the simulation operation before operation…3D printing could supplement routine CT scans, allowing surgeons to understand patients' fractures more intuitively and achieve better surgical results.” 

(Zhang, 2022)

Though availability and cost of 3D printing technologies and the software that enables it are improving they can still present a barrier. Issues with the quality of the 3D objects produced can occur due to image resolution. Waiting for the 3D model to be rendered and printed can also cause delays in a procedure. A meta-analysis (Wang, 2021) that assessed 3D printing applications in open reduction and internal fixation of pelvic fractures found a delay of between 3 to 7 hours to print the object. The computer-aided design phase also required significant time and involvement from the surgeons.

Application of 3D printing in surgical instructional settings offers advantages over other models as they can be customized to simulate the exact procedure or anatomy required, and they provide the haptic experience so far lacking in VR simulation. VR simulation does include the challenge of learning how to use the equipment and navigate the interface. The University of Michigan has produced high fidelity 3D printed simulators for surgical instruction of airway reconstruction, cleft palates, cleft lips, ear reconstruction and facial flaps. Tissue components can have varying ranges of stiffness by combining types of silicones and additives. 

These training applications could be a solution should there be another round of restrictions on nonessential surgery procedures such as were seen during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. At that time, the number of cases available for the education of surgery residents decreased dramatically. High fidelity 3D simulation could help.

“With high fidelity surgical simulators that can be rapidly 3D printed and a virtual curriculum, these residents could learn valuable surgical skills in remote settings.”

(Michaels, 2021)

For an overview of 3D printing in surgery, see:

Meyer-Szary J, Luis MS, Mikulski S, Patel A, Schulz F, Tretiakow D, Fercho J, Jaguszewska K, Frankiewicz M, Pawłowska E, Targoński R, Szarpak Ł, Dądela K, Sabiniewicz R, Kwiatkowska J. The Role of 3D Printing in Planning Complex Medical Procedures and Training of Medical Professionals—Cross-Sectional Multispecialty Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(6):3331. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063331

Tsoulfas G, Bangeas PI, Suri JS. 3D Printing : Application in Medical Surgery. (Tsoulfas G, Bangeas PI, Suri JS, eds.). Elsevier; 2020.

References

Yammine K, Karbala J, Maalouf A, Daher J, Assi C. Clinical outcomes of the use of 3D printing models in fracture management: a meta-analysis of randomized studies. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022 Oct;48(5):3479-3491. doi: 10.1007/s00068-021-01758-1. Epub 2021 Aug 12. PMID: 34383092.

Zhang M, Guo J, Li H, Ye J, Chen J, Liu J, Xiao M. Comparing the effectiveness of 3D printing technology in the treatment of clavicular fracture between surgeons with different experiences. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Nov 22;23(1):1003. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05972-9. PMID: 36419043; PMCID: PMC9682691.

Wang J, Wang X, Wang B, Xie L, Zheng W, Chen H, Cai L. Comparison of the feasibility of 3D printing technology in the treatment of pelvic fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and prospective comparative studies. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021 Dec;47(6):1699-1712. doi: 10.1007/s00068-020-01532-9. Epub 2020 Nov 1. PMID: 33130976.

Michaels, R., Witsberger, C. A., Powell, A. R., Koka, K., Cohen, K., Nourmohammadi, Z. (2021). 3D printing in surgical simulation: emphasized importance in the COVID-19 pandemic era. Journal of 3D printing in medicine, 2021;5(1): 5-9. doi:10.2217/3dp-2021-0009

Himmelfarb Health Sciences Library is hosting the National Library of Medicine traveling exhibition, Renaissance Science, Magic, and Medicine in Harry Potter's World. The exhibit is on the library’s first floor. It explores Renaissance era mythology, herbology, and texts inspiring Rowling’s fantasy series in a set of six panels featuring materials from the National Library of Medicine’s historical collections. 

Renaissance Science, Magic, and Medicine in Harry Potter's World exhibit panels at Himmelfarb Library
Renaissance Science, Magic, and Medicine in Harry Potter's World exhibit panels at Himmelfarb Library

Among the surprising Renaissance era true stories behind the books, did you know that Nicholas Flamel was an actual 14th century alchemist who invented a Philosopher’s Stone? The object was rumored to be able to turn all metals into gold and create an elixir granting immortality. However, it apparently didn't work for its inventor, as Flamel died in 1417. Rowling used Flamel and his Philosopher’s Stone as the key plot device for the first Harry Potter book, Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone.


The exhibit also features Heinrich Cornelius Agrippa von Nettesheim of the 15th century, a physician and occultist who wrote De Occulta Philosophia. He believed magic could benefit mankind if used respectfully.

“...in its original and pure form, magic was a sacred body of knowledge, providing the possibility of human dominion over all of created nature (elemental, celestial, and intellectual).”

Compagni, VP. (2021, Mar 18). Heinrich Cornelius Agrippa von Nettesheim. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Agrippa’s ideas frequently put him at odds with the church and rulers of his day, forcing him to move from country to country and change occupations frequently.1

In the 16th century, Konrad Gesner authored Historiae Animalium, a work of zoology that contained detailed descriptions and illustrations of animals, including basilisks, dragons and unicorns, all featured in the Harry Potter series. Gesner speculated that unicorns were “lost in the Flood,” and wrote about the medical uses of unicorn horn as a cure for poison and epilepsy.2 Apothecaries of the time claimed to stock it. 

The “female mandrake” was illustrated in the Hortus Sanitatis (Garden of Health) which described the medicinal uses of mandrake and showed the root as resembling a human figure. Mandrake was used as an anesthetic and was believed to have magical powers, including the fatal scream featured in Chamber of Secrets.

Want to explore more about the Renaissance traditions and writings inspiring Harry Potter’s world? Visit Himmelfarb Library between January 17 and February 25, 2023 to view the exhibit. Stay tuned to our blog and social media channels for upcoming activities related to the exhibit.

  1. Compagni, VP. (2021, Mar 18). Heinrich Cornelius Agrippa von Nettesheim. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/agrippa-nettesheim/
  2. The Metropolitan Museum of Art (2022). Historiae animalium (Histories of the Animals), Printed 1551. https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/479692