Skip to content

Photo of New York City Disability Pride Parade participants
Image by New York City Department of Transportation on Flickr, 3rd Annual Disability Pride Parade | NYC DOT, NYC MOPD, and … | Flickr CC BY-NC-ND 2.0

Many of us are familiar with Helen Keller and her impact on beliefs about disabled persons and disability rights in the early 20th century. There are others who have made profound impacts and are far less known and recognized. We pay tribute to some of these important disability rights activists and provide sources if you want to know more about these extraordinary women.

Elizabeth Ware Packard - Packard, born in Massachusetts in 1816, was needlessly committed to asylums twice in her life. At 19 her father sent her to an asylum in Worcester when she suffered from what was called “brain fever”. She believed the treatment she received made her symptoms worse. At the time asylums were “a quasi-prison, ruled by a psychiatric director”(Himelhoch, 1979). Patients had no rights to know their diagnosis, refuse treatment, or leave. As a middle-aged woman with six children, her husband committed her a second time when their religious beliefs diverged and she began to practice missionary and religious work outside the home. Though due process was required to institutionalize a man, husbands could commit wives without any evidence of mental illness. After three years at the Illinois Hospital for the Insane and a court case where she sued her husband for imprisoning her in their home after her release, Packard devoted the rest of her life to advocate for the rights of married women and the mentally ill through lectures, lobbying, and publications. Thanks to her work Illinois repealed the law that allowed women and children to be committed without due process safeguards; Iowa, Maine, and Massachusetts allowed visiting teams to assess conditions in their asylums; and, in Iowa, “Packard’s Law” made it illegal for asylum patients’ mail to be interfered with.

Learn more about Elizabeth Ware Packard at:

Brandman, Marianna. (2021). Elizabeth Packard. National Women’s History Museum.

Himelhoch, Myra Samuels, and Arthur H. Shaffer. (1979). Elizabeth Packard: Nineteenth-Century Crusader for the Rights of Mental Patients. Journal of American Studies 13.3, 343–375 https://www.jstor.org/stable/27553740 

Agatha Tiegel Hanson - Hanson was born in Pittsburgh in 1867 and became deaf and blind in one eye at 7 years of age after a case of spinal meningitis. She attended the Western Pennsylvania School for the Deaf and was one of the first women enrolled in the National Deaf-Mute College which became Gallaudet University. The success of her women’s debate group pushed the college president to lift his ban on women’s organizations on campus and she helped establish the Phi Kappa Zeta Society. She was the only woman to graduate in 1893 and the first woman valedictorian at the college. In her commencement address, “The Intellect of Women”, she argued against the structural inequalities women faced. After graduation, she taught, wrote poetry and newspaper articles, and was a community activist in Seattle with her deaf husband Olof. Gallaudet’s Hanson Plaza and Dining Hall are named in her honor.

Learn more about Agatha Tiegel Hanson at:

Arlington Public Library. (2019). This Week in 19th Amendment History: Agatha Tiegel Hanson 

Brooks, Gary. (2020) The Feather: The Agatha Tiegel Hanson Story, video production, Gallaudet Studios.

Jankowski, K., & Goss, K. L. (2023). Agatha Tiegel Hanson : our places in the sun. Gallaudet University Press.

Johnnie Lacy - Lacy was born in Louisiana in 1937 and moved to California when she was 10. She contracted polio during a practicum as a 19-year-old nursing student and became paralyzed. When she applied to a speech therapy program at San Francisco State as a wheelchair user in 1980, she was at first denied admission due to her disability. After asserting her rights under the Rehabilitation Act (the only federal protection for disabled persons at the time) she was admitted but was not allowed to participate in graduation ceremonies. She co-founded the Berkeley Center for Independent Living and was an early activist in the independent living movement. As a Black woman, Lacy advocated at the intersection of race and disability at a time when most who were prominent in the movement were white. 

Learn more about Johnnie Lacy at:

The Center for Learner Equity. (2021). Johnnie Lacy—An Advocate for Independent Living.

University of California. (1998). Johnnie Lacy: Director, Community Resources for Independent Living:  An African-American Woman's Perspective on the Independent Living Movement in the Bay Area 1960-1980, oral history/video.  

Barbara Faye Waxman Fiduccia - Waxman was born in Los Angeles in 1955. Both Barbara and her brother Michael were born with spinal muscular atrophy, a hereditary disorder that causes progressive muscular weakness. She used an external ventilation system most of her life. Waxman graduated from California State University, Northridge with a degree in psychology and worked for Planned Parenthood and the Los Angeles Regional Family Planning Council as a sexual health educator and counselor. She advocated for the reproductive rights of disabled persons, authoring many publications on the topic. She and her husband who was also disabled fought to protect their right to be married without losing their Medicaid and Medicare benefits and provided testimony to a congressional committee about it in 1994. Tragically, Waxman died a few days after her husband in 2001 when her ventilator malfunctioned. Disability rights advocates are still fighting to do away with “the marriage penalty”, most recently in the form of HR6405

Learn more about Barbara Faye Waxman Fiduccia at:

Gellene, D. (2020). Overlooked No More: Barbara Waxman Fiduccia, Reproductive Rights Advocate: Biography. The New York Times.

Mathews, J. (1994). Disabled Couple Faces Benefits Cut; Administration Faulted Over Marriage Penalty: FINAL Edition. The Washington Post.

Image with callout text We want your feedback! and Share your satisfaction with our recent library catalog change.

In January we changed the default search scope for Health Information @ Himmelfarb, the library catalog, to automatically include print materials at other Washington Research Library Consortium Libraries. Including this content can improve your search results when searching for books and topics beyond clinical medicine. Print materials can be borrowed for free from the other consortium libraries and delivered to Himmelfarb or the VSTC Library though the Consortium Loan Service. You can read more about the change in our previous Library News article.  

The change is temporary as we gather feedback about it from users. You can provide your feedback to us through the form that is linked at the top of Health Information @ Himmelfarb or directly here

Screenshot of library catalog search box with arrow pointing at link to feedback form.

We are particularly interested in your satisfaction with search results using the new default scope. If you report issues with other functions through the form we will reach out to you to find a resolution if you supply your email, or you can get immediate help during business hours using our chat service

In addition to feedback form input, we plan to hold a focus group for more insights into how you use Health Information @ Himmelfarb and the impact of the scope change. If you would be willing to participate in a focus group, respond on the feedback form and be sure to include your email address. Participants will be entered into a raffle for a $10 Starbucks gift card.

In its January 19th issue, Science reported on the increasingly aggressive and corrupt methods that paper mills are employing to get bogus research published in respected journals. You can listen to the Science podcast for an interview with the author of the article, Frederik Joelving from Retraction Watch

Last year Nicholas Wise, a fluid dynamics researcher at Cambridge with an interest in scientific fraud, found Facebook postings by Olive Academic (a Chinese paper mill) offering substantial payments to journal editors to accept papers for publication. Further digging revealed payments of up to $20,000 and a list of more than 50 journal editors who had signed on. Wise and other experts in scientific fraud joined up with Science and Retraction Watch to investigate if this was an isolated incident or more widespread. They found similar activity by several other paper mills and more than 30 editors of reputable journals who were complicit. Publishers like Elsevier and Taylor and Francis say they are under siege, admitting that their journal editors are regularly approached with bribes from paper mills.

Special editions of journals were found to be most vulnerable to these scams because they are often edited by individuals or teams separate from the regular editorial boards. The investigation found that paper mills will at times engineer entire special issues themselves. “The latest generation papermill, they’re like the entire production line” (Joelving, 2024). Open access special issues can generate large profits for publishers based on the fees collected from authors, sometimes via paper mills. Wiley, Elsevier and other well known publishers have had regular journal editors involved in these special issue scams.

As a result of the investigation Hindawi and its parent company Wiley pulled thousands of papers in special issues due to compromised peer review and Wiley announced in December that the Hindawi brand would be suspended. The Hindawi retracted papers had ties to Tamjeed Publishing that acted as a broker between paper mills and multiple editors. 

The need to publish to advance in certain professions becomes especially problematic in places where students or young professionals cannot easily attain the training or resources to do research that is publishable. This creates the market for paper mills. More than half of Chinese medical residents surveyed in a preprint referred to in the Science story said they had engaged in research misconduct such as buying papers or fabricating results. The Financial Times reported last year on how widespread the problem is in China and how it “threatens to overwhelm the editorial processes of a significant number of journals.”(Olcott and Smith, 2023)

It’s not just a problem in China. India, Russia, a number of ex-Soviet countries and Saudi Arabia are also common sources of paper mills engaging in these practices. There is concern that papers coming from these countries will start to draw extra scrutiny, creating potential inequities for researchers from them.

Though there is now increased awareness and a desire by reputable publishers to crack down on fraud, it is difficult and time consuming to do. The exponential growth of peer review fraud and sham papers make it all but impossible to ferret out all the publications that should be retracted. An analysis by Nature late last year concluded that over 10,000 articles were retracted in 2023 with retractions rising at a rate that far exceeds the growth of scientific papers. And they speculate it’s just the tip of the iceberg.

Retraction Watch alerts of retracted articles are available for Himmelfarb Library users when searching Health Information @ Himmelfarb, the library catalog, and when using the LibKey Nomad browser extension or BrowZine to connect to full-text. Read more about the service.

Sources

Joelving, F. (2024). Paper trail. Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science), 383(6680), 252–255. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.ado0309

Olcott, E., & Smith, A. (2023). China’s fake science industry: how ‘paper mills’ threaten progress. FT.Com. https://wrlc-gwahlth.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/01WRLC_GWAHLTH/1c5oj26/cdi_proquest_reports_2791535957

Van Noorden, R. (2023). More than 10,000 research papers were retracted in 2023 - a new record.  Nature, 624, 479-481. www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-03974-8

MeSH Tree icon and banner saying New Headings for 2024

Each year the indexing team at the National Library of Medicine (NLM) updates descriptors and makes new headings available for searching in PubMed, MEDLINE, and other NLM databases. The 2024 changes were applied in December 2023. You can see new descriptors and changed descriptors on the NLM site.

There were changes to headings for Influenzavirus A (now Alphainfluenzavirus) and Respiratory Syncytial Virus (three new entry terms for Chimpanzee Coryza Agent, Orthopneumovirus, and RSV Respiratory Syncytial Virus that will map to the heading when searching). Voting became a new MeSH heading. And there was a large expansion of terms available for concepts related to Psychological Stress - 54 to be precise! For example, you can now explode Coping Skills to cover nine concepts including Behavioral Coping and Cognitive Coping.

Other new terms include some coming out of the pandemic (immune system exhaustion, mental health teletherapy, pandemic preparedness, unvaccinated persons), some that are DEI-related (deaf culture, disability discrimination, social genomics, and undertreatment), and others that invite a visit to the scope note to see what they are all about (flighted spongy moth complex?)

Changes and new headings are not retrospective. For example, if searching for Influenzavirus A you will need to search the new Alphainfluenzavirus heading and the previous Influenzavirus A heading to get both new and older publications. To search for Voting prior to 2024 you may want to consider using the broader heading Politics which the concept was included under previously. 

For precision searching with MeSH headings, NLM encourages you to consult the MeSH Browser for scope notes and other information about a term. It can guide you to the right headings, subheadings (see the Qualifiers tab), and entry terms. Entry terms function like cross references so searching RSV will include the publications indexed for Respiratory Syncytial Virus since it’s an entry term for that heading. If you don’t want entry or mapped terms to be included, use double quotes to limit your search to just that precise heading.

NNLM will be offering a free webinar on MeSH Changes and PubMed Searching on January 25th from 1 to 2:30pm. You’ll hear more about the changes and have an opportunity to practice searching in PubMed. The class is available for beginner through advanced searchers.

Himmelfarb Library provides the BrowZine journal reader to library users to help keep current and make browsing journal contents online easy. We are pleased to see an uptick in usage of BrowZine by library users this past year!

Infographic showing increased usage of BrowZine bookshelf, table of contents and full-text downloads for 2022-23

When searching Health Information @ Himmelfarb, the library catalog, you may have seen and used the links to View Issue Contents in catalog records:

Article search result screenshot with Download PDF and View Issue Contents options circled

These links direct users to BrowZine to view journal tables of contents and download full-text when available.

Screenshot of BrowZine table of contents for the journal Infants & Young Children

Library users can set up a BrowZine account and follow journals of interest to them by putting them on a BrowZine bookshelf. Whenever a new issue is published for a bookshelf journal, an email notifying of the new content is sent.

You can access BrowZine from a web browser or download the app for iOS or Android. When using the mobile app you can save articles to read offline later.   

Learn more about BrowZine in our Current Awareness Research Guide.

Earlier this week we launched a change to Health Information @ Himmelfarb, the library catalog. The default search scope is now “Articles + GW & Consortium Catalog”. This includes physical materials, primarily print books, from other academic libraries in the Washington Research Library Consortium (including Gelman and other GW Libraries) as well as Himmelfarb’s content (books, journal articles, videos, and more) in your search results.

There are many instances when including this content will improve your search results. Searches for books and topics beyond clinical medicine will frequently be enhanced by inclusion of the holdings of these libraries. The consortium content will be included in your search results automatically now. You’ll be able to see where items retrieved are available when you click through to the full record from search results:

Health Information @ Himmelfarb search results screen with consortium book result
Consortium book full record screen in Health Information @ Himmelfarb with holding libraries listed.

The Consortium Loan Service (CLS) allows you to request these items and have them delivered directly to Himmelfarb Library or the VSTC Library. You will see the option for the CLS Request form when you are signed into Health Information @ Himmelfarb with your GW UserID. Items borrowed on CLS typically arrive within a week of request. There are no charges or limits on how many CLS requests you can make.

Consortium loan service request form in Health Information @ Himmelfarb

If you prefer to use the original default search scope which includes Himmelfarb collections and subscription content only, you can still find it by clicking the down arrow in the search box and selecting the Articles + Himmelfarb Catalog scope.

Health Information @ Himmelfarb search box on home page with Articles + Himmelfarb Catalog scope selected

The change in default search scopes will continue through the Spring 2024 semester and then we will assess whether to make it permanent or revert back. Please provide feedback on the change by clicking on the link in the banner at the top of Health Information @ Himmelfarb pages.

Banner at top of Health Information @ Himmelfarb notifying about scope change and with link to feedback form

Your feedback will help us make the decision that is most helpful to you, our users. GW SMHS, SON and SPH students, faculty and staff who would be willing to participate in a brief focus group about the change can include contact information in the feedback form and will be entered in a raffle for Starbucks $10 gift cards.

December is Universal Human Rights Month and this past Sunday (December 10th) was the 75th commemoration of the adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights by the UN. The declaration was formed three years after the ratification of the United Nations charter. In the wake of the horrors of World War II there was a strong impetus to establish both a peacekeeping body and an agreed set of fundamental human rights to be universally protected.

Among the rights in the declaration are:

  • All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.
  • Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.
  • No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.
  • All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law. 

There are over 30 articles in the declaration, ensuring freedom of movement, right to asylum, right to education, freedom of peaceful assembly, freedom of opinion and expression, freedom of religion, and right to privacy among others. It recognizes the right to marry and equal rights and dignity in employment. Article 25 specifically addresses the right to medical care:

“Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age or other lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond his control. (United Nations, 1948)”

The United States is a signatory to the Declaration. Despite this, our government does not always live up to the ideals of the document. The structure of the health care system in the US does not support the standard of universal care guaranteed in Article 25 and the US has failed to ratify most of the international treaties that include a right to health (Willen, 2019). FDR advocated a Second Bill of Rights to include the right to “adequate medical care and the opportunity to achieve and enjoy good health” in his 1944 State of the Union. President Truman was also an advocate of a national health insurance program tied to Social Security. But in the 1940’s private health insurance became more common in the US, covering about half of the population, and the insurance industry created a barrier to further proposals for a national health program at the federal level (Berkowitz, 2005). 

The Johnson administration established Medicare and Medicaid in 1965 after a many years long fight and negotiation with the insurance industry. It was largely successful because it covered vulnerable populations who typically were too high risk to be privately insured. For decades many Americans fell through the gaps between the coverage of those programs and private insurance. 

While the Affordable Care Act of 2010 brought affordable health care to millions more, the country still fails to provide care to everyone and the current complex system of public and private funding increases inefficiencies and costs. A post pandemic study documented how our “fragmented and inefficient health care system” cost over 200,000 more lives and billions more in expenses during the Covid pandemic than a single payer system would have (Galvani, et al. 2022).  A 2022 survey published by KFF (formerly Kaiser Family Foundation) estimates that 41% of adults currently have some debt as a result of medical or dental treatment and one in 10 has significant medical debt. A quarter say they have debt that is past due or that they are unable to pay. One in four black adults, lower-income adults, and uninsured don't think they will ever pay off their health care debt. 

A January 2023 Gallup poll found that 57% of Americans say the government should guarantee health coverage for everyone, but a 53% majority want to preserve the current private insurance system. The AMA endorses expanding ACA and Medicare while preserving the current system of private insurance while Physicians for a National Health Insurance Program advocates for a non-profit single payer system. The American Academy of Family Physicians takes the middle ground  of laying out multiple options to get to universal care including a single payer model, a public option, and Medicare/Medicaid buy in.

However it is achieved, further progress in health care reform is necessary to provide the universal coverage all Americans deserve and reduce the costs and inefficiencies that are negatively impacting the delivery of healthcare in the US.

Sources

Berkowitz E. (2005). Medicare and Medicaid: the past as prologue. Health care financing review, 27(2), 11–23.

Galvani, A. P., Parpia, A. S., Pandey, A., Sah, P., Colón, K., Friedman, G., Campbell, T., Kahn, J. G., Singer, B. H., & Fitzpatrick, M. C. (2022). Universal healthcare as pandemic preparedness: The lives and costs that could have been saved during the COVID-19 pandemic. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 119(25), e2200536119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2200536119

United Nations (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights. https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights

Willen S. S. (2019). Invoking Health and Human Rights in the United States: Museums, Classrooms, and Community-Based Participatory Research. Health and Human Rights, 21(1), 157–162.

Photo of vets with US flags at a fundraising event.

6 million US veterans receive care at a Veterans Health Administration (VHA) facility at least once a year. There are 1,298 sites of care within the VA system including medical centers, outpatient clinics, and nursing homes. Access to VA care is available to veterans who have proven service-related disabilities. They are “poorer, older, and sicker than private sector patients” (Veterans Healthcare Policy Institute and the National VA Council of the American Federation of Government Employees, 2023).

These facilities have been chronically understaffed for decades, resulting in long wait times for service for many veterans. In 2014, Congress passed the Veterans Access Choice and Accountability Act which allowed veterans to seek care at approved community clinics. A 2022 JAMA study found that between January 2018 and June 2021, veterans waited an average of 29 days for a primary care appointment and that time varied substantially depending on where the care facility was located. The study reported wait times extended to 38.9 days for those using community-based clinics. Allowing veterans to use these resources did not result in reduced wait times. A VA Department Inspector General’s audit in 2022 found that the wait times the VA system reported misrepresented the time a patient had to wait for care, using the date of appointment creation instead of the day the service was requested. For example, a cardiology appointment was logged as a 43-day wait when it was actually 66 from the date referred (US Dept of Veterans Affairs, 2022).

A survey of Veterans Affairs personnel conducted in Spring 2022 included the following findings:

  • 96% of VHA respondents indicated their facility needs more frontline clinical staff. 75% percent said their facility needs more administrative staff. 77% said that there are vacant positions for which no recruitment is taking place. 
  • 77% of those who responded to the survey reported that their VHA facilities have closed beds, units, and/or programs due to staffing and budget shortfalls. 
  • 55% of VHA respondents said they have less time to deliver direct patient care and support services than they did four years ago.

(Veterans Healthcare Policy Institute and the National VA Council of the American Federation of Government Employees, 2023)

This study recommended a number of measures to improve staffing, burnout, and inadequate facilities to serve the needs of the 9/11 generation of veterans who are “among the most disabled in the nation’s history.” These measures include increasing funding to support hiring and retention, infrastructure improvements at existing facilities, and construction of new and expanded facilities. HR dysfunction resulting from a Trump-era human resource management project that sought to centralize HR activities has resulted in delays in hiring. “Almost 50 percent of respondents said that the HR modernization project had increased the time it takes to hire a new employee… 93 percent said they had lost candidates to competing offers because of delays in the HR hiring process.” The report recommends that HR activities come back to the local level to allow personnel managers to respond to local conditions and needs.

Last year VA employee unions lobbied Congress to pass the “VA Employee Fairness Act” which will allow clinical staff collective bargaining rights. This should result in higher salaries and improved benefits and working conditions.

The VA also recently launched an AI Tech Sprint to develop tools that will ease the paperwork burdens on clinicians. Up to $1 million will be awarded to winning teams of developers. It is part of a Reduce Employee Burnout and Optimize Organizational Thriving (REBOOT) Task Force aimed at achieving hiring and retention goals. 30 chief well-being officers at VA healthcare facilities are meeting with frontline employees to gather and communicate their feedback on desired change. One of those is more flexible scheduling, for example, allowing nurses to work a “72 for 80” schedule of three 12-hour shifts a week. The VA is optimistic that these changes will help the agency meet ambitious FY 2023 hiring and retention goals.

Sources

Feyman Y, Asfaw DA, Griffith KN. Geographic Variation in Appointment Wait Times for US Military Veterans. JAMA Network Open. 2022;5(8):e2228783. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.28783

Heckman, J. (2023). VA launches AI Tech Sprint to reduce burnout among health care employees. Federal News Network. https://federalnewsnetwork.com/artificial-intelligence/2023/10/va-launches-ai-tech-sprint-to-accelerate-work-reducing-burnout-in-health-care-workforce/

US Department of Veterans Affairs/Office of Inspector General. (2022). Concerns with Consistency and Transparency in the Calculation and Disclosure of Patient Wait Time Data. https://www.va.gov/oig/pubs/VAOIG-21-02761-125.pdf

Veterans Healthcare Policy Institute and the National VA Council of the American Federation of Government Employees. (2023). Disadvantaging the VA: How VA Staff View Agency Privatization and Other Detrimental Policies. https://www.afge.org/globalassets/documents/generalreports/2023/03/vhpireport_v2.pdf

We are very happy to welcome Rebecca Kyser to the Himmelfarb Library staff! Rebecca started work here as a Reference and Instruction Librarian in early October. She joins us from Otterbein University in Ohio where she was an Information Literacy Librarian. Rebecca has a Master of Science in Library and Information Science from the University of Illinois where she won the Health Science Information Management Award and a Bachelor’s degree in English and Digital Studies from the University of Wisconsin. Here’s some things to know about Rebecca!

Tell us about your studies and work before Himmelfarb and how you got here.

Before Himmelfarb, I was a Visiting Information Literacy Librarian at a liberal arts college in central Ohio. It was a blast working there: I got to teach my own course during spring semester, and I had a lot of fun working with students. While I was in grad school, I worked as a research assistant studying Covid-19 misinformation, along with other types of health misinformation. I continue to do that research to this day; I find it somewhat amusing that I only have a TikTok account for research purposes. 

What are you doing in your new position at Himmelfarb?

My position here is to serve in Reference and Instruction. Along with my colleagues, I’ll be working at the reference desk, monitoring the online reference chat, and doing some instruction in the Practice of Medicine courses. I hope to bring my specialized knowledge into the library more: medical misinformation has always existed but social media has really amplified it. My hope is that I can provide resources to better help students prepare for encountering it in practice. 

What have you most enjoyed about working here so far?

I’m really excited to work in an actual medical library. It’s super interesting to see what students are working on, and how we approach medical education in the digital age. My Mom worked as a nurse in the old GW Hospital, so it’s really fun to compare her stories to how things are today.

What if anything has surprised you?

I don’t think I’m surprised by much, as I have worked in both medicine and librarianship before, but I will say I am adjusting from going from the Midwest to the East Coast. The fact that train service is so abundant here has been delightful: I don’t miss the amount of driving I had to do, that’s for sure. 

What do you like to do in your time away from work?

I’m a pretty avid knitter, so my hands are often busy with my latest project. I’m also a huge fan of board games and trivia, so if anyone needs help on learning the board game Pandemic (we have it on the first floor), I would be happy to help. 

The holiday season brings joy and celebration. It can also amplify stress levels with the rush of activity and expectations associated. National Stress Awareness Day is well timed at the beginning of November to raise attention to the stress many feel at this time of year. Founded by the International Stress Management Association, National Stress Awareness Day is intended to “increase public awareness and help people recognize, manage, and reduce stress in their personal and professional lives.”

A daily mindful self check-in can help you identify when you are feeling stressed, anxious, or down.

If you are feeling stressed there are practices that can help immediately relieve everyday stressors. Try a brief meditation like this Self Havening practice:

Self Havening for Stress by Ulf Sandstrom on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FWK0UN-uWwA&t=210s

The GW Office of Integrative Medicine has a set of short videos for finding calm in the storm. Check their Calming Breath Playlist on YouTube. Here’s a sample of what’s on the list -

Fifteen minute Meditation

Forest Bathing

Closing the Stress Worry Loop

The GW SMHS Resiliency & Well-Being Center has a more extensive set of resources for stress relief, anxiety, and self-care. They also provide a live mind/body practice every Friday at 2pm through their A Mindfulness Experience webinars.

If you want to talk to someone about your stress or anxiety, the Resiliency & Well-Being Center will provide brief counseling and referral services. Contact their offices at 202-994-2502 or email them at rwc@gwu.edu. Their Peer Caregiver program trains managers and staff to identify colleagues in need of support and get them on the road to assistance. If you’re interested in becoming a Peer Caregiver, fill out their interest form. Here is a list of trained Peer Caregivers in SMHS.