Skip to content

Image of a diverse group of teenagers talking. Text: National Minority Mental Health Awareness Month.
Image from https://minorityhealth.hhs.gov/national-minority-mental-health-awareness-month-2024-toolkit

July is National Minority Mental Health Awareness Month! This important yearly observance aims to raise awareness about the unique challenges that impact the mental health of racial and ethnic minority populations. This year’s theme is Be the Source for Better Health: Improving Health Outcomes Through Our Cultures, Communities, and Connections, which emphasizes how the unique social determinants of health of racial and ethnic minority populations impact overall health, including mental health.

Social determinants of health have a profound impact on both physical and mental health. The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) defines social determinants of health (SDOH) as “non-medical factors that affect health outcomes” and can include “the conditions in which people are born, grow, work, live, and age” (CDC, 2024). Five key social determinants of health highlighted in Healthy People 2030 include education access and quality, health care and quality, the neighborhood and built environment, social and community context, and economic stability.

Image of icons used by the CDC for the 5 key social determinates of health.
(CDC, 2024)

Economic stability is a key determinant of mental health. According to Alegria et al. “unemployment, precarious employment, and employment conditions” are linked to “increased psychological distress, even in countries with universal healthcare, where employer-provided health insurance is less essential to accessing services” (Alegria et al., 2018). Economic stability, neighborhood, and the built environment play a role in food security. Lower-income people are more likely to live in food deserts (areas with limited access to plentiful, affordable, or nutritious food). According to a 2020 National Public Radio article, 19 million Americans, about 6% of Americans lived in a food desert in 2015 (Silva, 2020). Black and Hispanic Americans are disproportionately impacted by food insecurity, with 19.1% of Black households and 15.6% of Hispanic households experiencing food insecurity in 2019, compared to only 7.9% of White households (Silva, 2020). 

“Food insecurity and poor diet quality have also been linked to poorer mental health in the United States and Canada” (Alegria et al., 2018). Poor mental health outcomes associated with food insecurity include depression and anxiety. According to Morrison and Frank, there is “a dose-response relationship between the severity of food insecurity and the prevalence of depressive symptoms” (Morrison & Frank, 2023). Food insecurity can also lead to psychological stress responses including “higher levels of anxiety, frustration, and a sense of powerlessness” (Morrison & Frank, 2023). 

Social and community contexts also play a vital role in the social determinants of mental health. Violence within the community can have a large impact on mental health. “Direct and indirect experiences of community violence in adolescence have been significantly associated with elevated depressive, anxiety, and PTSD symptoms” (Alegria et al., 2018). Additionally, living in areas with high incarceration rates is associated with an increased risk of a major depressive or generalized anxiety disorder (Alegria et al., 2018). 

Some unchangeable, fixed characteristics, such as race/ethnicity, nationality, gender, and sexual orientation, also play an important role in mental health. The intersectionality between minority status of race, sexual orientation, and gender identity is an important consideration (Morrison & Frank, 2023). LGBT adults who are also racial/ethnic minorities reported poorer mental health than white respondents (Alegria et al., 2018). Higher rates of suicide have been reported among minority youth who were also marginalized due to sexual orientation and gender identity (Morrison & Frank, 2023). 

It’s important to understand the relationship between social determinants and mental health. “Poor mental health can aggravate personal choices and affect living conditions that limit opportunities” (Alegria et al., 2018). A focus on improving social determinants of health will help improve mental health for minorities who are often disproportionately impacted. “Multilevel interventions aimed at eliminating systemic social inequalities - such as access to educational and employment opportunities, healthy food, secure housing, and safe neighborhoods - are crucial” (Alegria et al., 2018). Primary care physicians can use validated screening tools such as the Social Needs Screening Tool developed by the American Academy of Family Physicians (Morrison & Frank, 2023). Social prescribing, linking patients to appropriate social and community services, is another option for physicians. By addressing the social determinants of health that impact minority mental health through a comprehensive approach, we can work to “advance health equity, reduce health disparities, and Be the Source for Better Health for racial and ethnic minority and American Indian and Alaska Native populations” (HHS, 2024).

References:

Alegría, M., NeMoyer, A., Falgàs Bagué, I., Wang, Y., & Alvarez, K. (2018). Social Determinants of Mental Health: Where We Are and Where We Need to Go. Current psychiatry reports, 20(11), 95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-018-0969-9 

Centers for Disease Control (CDC). (2024). Social Determinants of Health. https://www.cdc.gov/public-health-gateway/php/about/social-determinants-of-health.html

U.S. Department of Health & Human Services Office of Minority Health (HHS). (2024). National Minority Mental Health Awareness Month 2024 Toolkit. https://minorityhealth.hhs.gov/national-minority-mental-health-awareness-month-2024-toolkit

Morrison, L., & Frank, C. J. (2023). Social Determinants of Mental and Behavioral Health. Primary care, 50(4), 679–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pop.2023.04.003

Silva, C. (September 27, 2020). Food insecurity in the U.S. by the numbers. National Public Radio (NPR). https://www.npr.org/2020/09/27/912486921/food-insecurity-in-the-u-s-by-the-numbers

one person's hand holding another person's hand

June is Cancer Survivors Month. Any cancer diagnosis induces feelings of anxiety, uncertainty and fear in patients. While novel approaches to and treatments for cancer are improving survival rates, social determinants of health continue to exert significant impact on patients’ ability to experience positive outcomes to treatment. Let’s look at one of these determinants, economic stability, in the context of cancer survival.

The term “cancer-related financial toxicity” was introduced in 2013 by Zafar and Abernethy, and described as, “the patient-level impact of the cost of cancer care” (Zafar and Abernethy, 2013). Even those patients who are privately insured are not protected from financial toxicity, as a 2022 study published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute found. Out-of-pocket expenditures by privately-insured cancer patients in the United States have increased, due to the rise in high-deductible insurance plans and greater expected patient contribution to medical expenses (Shih et al, 2022).

How best, then, to help patients navigate the potential financial burdens of a cancer diagnosis, and thereby improve their potential treatment outcomes? A 2023 scoping review in Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology examined interventions for financial toxicity among cancer survivors. The interventions discussed include: financial navigation, which includes identifying patients at high risk for financial toxicity, offering guidance on out-of-pocket costs, and facilitating access to programs to alleviate financial stress. Financial counseling helps patients access advice and guidance on managing financial toxicity caused by cancer treatment. Insurance education entails providing patients a structured way to develop insurance literacy and assistance in choosing a plan. Other types of interventions examined included multidisciplinary psychosocial supports, intensive symptom assessments, and supportive care (Yuan et al, 2023).

The effectiveness of the interventions, researchers found, were closely tied to the causes of the cancer-related financial toxicity, with socioeconomic and employment status, cancer stage, and type of treatment, type of insurance, as well as coping skills all having a direct impact on how effective financial interventions could be. Looking closely at just one of the interventions mentioned above, engaging with financial navigation helped cancer patients save significant dollar amounts annually by facilitating the procurement of free medication, and insurance premium and co-pay assistance.

The financial interventions described in the evidence reviewed differed greatly, but more generally, the recent focus in the literature on finding ways to alleviate financial toxicity frequently faced by cancer patients is one promising step towards improving outcomes for all patients dealing with cancer.

References

Debela, D. T., Muzazu, S. G., Heraro, K. D., Ndalama, M. T., Mesele, B. W., Haile, D. C., Kitui, S. K., & Manyazewal, T. (2021). New approaches and procedures for cancer treatment: Current perspectives. SAGE open medicine, 9, 20503121211034366. https://doi.org/10.1177/20503121211034366

Lau, L. M. S., Khuong-Quang, D. A., Mayoh, C., Wong, M., Barahona, P., Ajuyah, P., Senapati, A., Nagabushan, S., Sherstyuk, A., Altekoester, A. K., Fuentes-Bolanos, N. A., Yeung, V., Sullivan, A., Omer, N., Diamond, Y., Jessop, S., Battaglia, L., Zhukova, N., Cui, L., Lin, A., … Ziegler, D. S. (2024). Precision-guided treatment in high-risk pediatric cancers. Nature medicine, 10.1038/s41591-024-03044-0. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-024-03044-0

Shih, Y. T., Xu, Y., Bradley, C., Giordano, S. H., Yao, J., & Yabroff, K. R. (2022). Costs Around the First Year of Diagnosis for 4 Common Cancers Among the Privately Insured. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 114(10), 1392–1399. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djac141

Yuan, X., Zhang, X., He, J., & Xing, W. (2023). Interventions for financial toxicity among cancer survivors: A scoping review. Critical reviews in oncology/hematology, 192, 104140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2023.104140

Zafar SY, Abernethy AP. Financial toxicity, Part I: a new name for a growing problem. Oncology (Williston Park, NY). 2013;27(2):80-149.