Skip to content

17664002728_acb9354acf_bRecently, the NIH took steps to help protect the credibility of published research findings from NIH-funded research. In a recent blog post, the National Library of Medicine called on librarians to help in this effort. In NIH Guide Notice OD-18-011, released on November 3, 2017, the NIH requested support for authors by asking grantees, contractors, researchers, and librarians to:

  1. Adhere to the principles of research integrity and publication ethics
  2. Identify journals that follow best practices promoted by professional scholarly publishing organizations
  3. Avoid publishing in journals lacking clearly stated and rigorous peer-review processes.

 

What should you do when deciding where to publish your research?

  1. Evaluate the options using guided by one of these resources:
  2. Access Himmelfarb’s Scholarly Publishing Research Guide for resources to help you decide where to publish:
  3. Consult your librarian. Librarians have experience in developing rigorous collection criteria when considering journals to include in library collections. Thanks to this expertise, librarians are extremely familiar with journal publishers as well as with the journals that are being used by researchers and for publication.

 

Researcher-authors can often find it difficult to evaluate a journal's quality, editorial practices, peer-review practices, and scientific merit. Librarians can be a great help to authors in selecting publishing venues. If you are getting ready to publish and need assistance in selecting the best journal for your article or research, Himmelfarb has resources that can help!

 

Sources:

Marill, J., Funk, K., Sheehan, J. (2017, November 7). Calling on librarians to help ensure the credibility of published research results [web log post]. Retrieved from https://nlmdirector.nlm.nih.gov/2017/11/07/calling-on-librarians-to-help-ensure-the-credibility-of-published-research-results/

Mediterranean Center of Medical Sciences (2015).  Research [online image].  Retrieved from https://www.flickr.com/photos/mcmscience/17664002728

Scholarly publishing has undergone a significant transformation with the rise of the Internet. Scholarly journals are now predominantly available in electronic format rather than in traditional print formats.

This shift prompted the introduction of open access publishing - a movement that aims to provide scholarly research to researchers and the public at no cost to the reader, thus removing the cost barrier to access research.

However, this movement has also opened the door for “predatory” journals to use open access model to profit from researchers and faculty who are pressured to publish in order to receive promotion and tenure.  A comparison of the similarities and differences in characteristics of both predatory and legitimate journals could help readers and potential authors spot predatory journals more easily.

A recent article published in the March 2017 issue of BMC Medicine provides the results of just such a comparison. A cross-sectional comparison of potentially predatory, presumed legitimate open access, and presumed legitimate subscription-based biomedical journals was conducted. Roughly 100 randomly selected journals in each category was selected for this review. Each journal was evaluated on criteria within specific characteristics including:

  • Aims & scope
  • Journal name & publisher
  • Homepage integrity (look & feel)
  • Indexing & impact factor
  • Editors & staff
  • Editorial process & peer review
  • Publication ethics & policies
  • Publication model & copyright
  • Journal location & contact

The results are summarized in this infographic:

https://magic.piktochart.com/embed/22961232-predatory-vs-legitimate-can-you-tell-the-difference

Source:
Shamseer, L., Moher, D., Maduekwe, O., Turner, L., Barbour, V., Burch, R., & ... Shea, B. J. (2017). Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison. BMC Medicine, 15(1), 28. doi:10.1186/s12916-017-0785-9

scholarly_bannerA well-organized abstract is key to getting your paper accepted for publication.  Attend this session of Himmelfarb Library's series Updates in Scholarly Communication: Publishing, Impact, and Visibility.  During the session, panel participants will share strategies and tips for writing an abstract that will increase your chances of getting accepted to a top-quality journal or conference.

Date:  Wednesday, April 12, 2017
Time:  4:30pm - 6:00pm
Location:  Ross Hall, Lobby C
Categories:  Updates in Scholarly Communications: Publishing, Impact, and Visibility

Please register and attend!

gwresearchdaysAre you ready for research day?

  • Don't forget to submit your abstract!  The deadline is Tuesday, February 28, 2017.
  • Sign up for a workshop to learn more about effective poster content and design:

Workshop: An Overview of Effective Poster Content and Design
Designing a poster can be challenging. Learn best practices on what content to include to effectively display your results, data and conclusions as well as common mistakes to avoid.
Date: 02/22/2017
Time: 12:00pm - 1:00pm
Location: Ross Hall, Room 201 & online via WebEx
[Register]

gwresearchdaysParticipating in GW Research Day?

Sign-up for Himmelfarb's Ramp Up for Research Day Workshop series designed to help students create their abstracts and posters for GW Research Day.

Creating a poster can be challenging. Learn best practices on what content to include to effectively display your results, data and conclusions as well as common mistakes to avoid.  The Overview of Effective Poster Content and Design Workshop can be attended either on-campus or online via GW WebEx.

What: An Overview of Effective Poster Content and Design Workshop
Date:
02/22/2017
Time: 12:00pm - 1:00pm
Location: Ross Hall, Room 201
[Register]

*** Reminder - Deadline for abstracts is Tuesday, February 28, 2017 ***

Submit an abstract for GW Research Day!

If you are not sure your research fits the criteria for GW Research Day go to the FAQ's for quick answers or contact resdays@gwu.edu.

Need help with writing your abstract?
Watch the The ABCs of Abstract Writing Workshop videos by Dr. Linda Werling.

NOTE: A GW NetID required to view videos.

Don't forget to mark your calendars! GW Research Day, Wednesday, April 5, 2017

gw_research_day_logoDo you need help writing your abstract? Sign up for ABCs of Abstract Writing workshop and learn the key components of how to summarize your major findings and write an effective abstract.

Beginning December 1st students will be able to submit abstracts for GW Research Day 2017.

The ABCs of Abstract Writing
Instructor: Dr. Linda Werling

  • Date: Wednesday, November 9, 2016
  • Time: 3:00pm - 4:00pm
  • Location: Ross Hall, Room 229
    NOTE: This class is offered simultaneously in a face-to-face setting and online via WebEx.

Mark your calendars! GW Research Day, Wednesday, April 5, 2017

 

citation neededThe next time that you need citation help, consider using one of Himmelfarb Library's citation guides on APA Citation Style, AMA Citation Style or Harvard Citation Style.  These three Research Guides, created and maintained by Gisela Butera, are extremely popular.

Gisela created the APA citation guide near the end of 2009 and since then it's been viewed nearly 3 million times.  Her AMA citation guide was created several years later and is building steadily toward 2 million uses.  Gisela's guide to the Harvard Citation Style is less used, but only comparatively as users still access it 80 times or more each month.

Each of these citation style guides provides you with the basics of reference list and in-text citations for multiple publications types including journal articles, books, book chapters, etc.  These guides also provide users additional information on formatting papers per the citation style and avoiding plagiarism.

 

Image citation: www.futureatlas.com (2010). Citation needed [image].  Available at: https://www.flickr.com/photos/87913776@N00/5129607997/

tcsYou've just finished your first research article, and are now looking for a potential journal to submit your work. With so many journals available in your field, and the proliferation of deceptive or predatory publishing practices, how do you identify which journals are high-quality?

 

Think. Check. Submit is a new cross-industry initiative that aims to help authors identify trustworthy journals. This initiative provides a checklist for authors of what to look for to help you make an informed decision on where to publish.
For assistance in evaluating journals and deciding where to publish, contact Acquisitions & Resource Sharing Librarian Meaghan Corbett at corbettm@gwu.edu.