Category: Sydney

I spent a good amount of time in the last week planning and fine-tuning what would be best for the models (database tables) and how they need to be able to interact with each other. I also have been working on getting the project set up on the server and the web app moved over onto the server. 

Below shows one of my diagrams of keys (primary and foreign) that I will be using in the models- this took a couple of re-dos in order for me to consider it efficient, but I learned some really important lessons about relations between tables and had to seriously think through how I will want to be accessing and changing these databases through the web app.

Having never worked with a database before, let alone a framework like Django, I really have had to dedicate a great deal of time to understanding how different elements work with one another, and how to configure the whole set-up so it actually works. Not that I have completely mastered anything, or that I’ve done every Django and SQL tutorial out there (just... most of them), but I really am feeling more confident about using Django and creating a back-end for the web app that I ever anticipated.

A couple successes & updates in the last week:

Dr. Pless suggested an addition to the web app (for right now, as the database is not up yet) - storing the photo that was last taken on the app as the overlay for the next photo. I used the LocalStorage JavaScript API, which I had already used to display the photo after it was taken on the next page, to make this happen and while it will only show the last photo you took using the web app, it’s still a pretty cool thing until we can get the database up and running!

The photo on the left shows the overlay in action- the blurriness is due to my shaking hand in trying to take the screenshot, but it was really great to see a sneak peek of what the web app will eventually become. The photo on the left shows the page after the photo is taken, displaying the photo with the choice to hold down to save to your camera roll along with sharing on social media and other options that I haven’t worked on yet.

I’ve been working on the plans for the flow as well as appearance of the site and have been drawing out my ideas, so there is a plan for the front-end! I’m currently more focused on the back-end, but when the time comes, I’m really excited to start working on giving Project rePhoto the eye-catching, modern look it deserves!

We’re still trying to come up with a Project rePhoto tagline- a couple of strong ones so far have been “chronicle change in your world” and “track what you care about”, and I’d love to hear more! There’s sticky notes by my desk if you ever think of an idea!

I would really appreciate any feedback that anyone has on what I’ve done so far; thanks for reading and happy Thursday!

The last week has seen a few dozen changes and improvements to the flow and functionality of the web app for Project rePhoto. Some changes of note: I added the ability to create new projects and subjects (requiring one subject with one entry to be created when the project is), the overlay will always be the first photo that was uploaded to the subject, and you can upload photos to a subject as a URL, which will then be converted to an .png image by a Python script I wrote this week.

Here’s a diagram I made to map out the flow of the web app, which is reflected in the current version of the web app (though it is a skeleton version without any backend functionality): rePhoto-flow

I also spent a decent amount of time earlier this week taking a deeper look at and getting more comfortable with Django. This is my current plan for the file management for the functionality of the web app: rePhoto-file-mgmt

I’ve also been working, without too much luck, on saving the photos locally on the devices they are taken on, and am working today on getting the “hold down to save” functionality working (which would be clunky but users are relatively familiar with doing this on their phones).

A few questions that I’ve been working towards answering:

• When making the choice to require each new project to have at least one subject, with one entry, I thought about projects like RinkWatch (a collection of ice rinks around North America) and Scenic Overlooks (a compilation of views from various hikes), which have had a lot of subjects, but very few entries. Should we require the user to add an entry to each subject when it is created, even though we would no longer be able to allow for projects like RinkWatch?
• Instead of providing a list of subjects, which would require our users to know the exact name of the subject they’re looking to add to, I thought it might be useful to use an Open Street Maps API, like the one that already exists in the View Projects section of the rePhoto website, to allow users to be able to view the subjects on a map before choosing one to contribute to. Kartograph (https://kartograph.org/) also seems to be another option, so I’m going to do some research in the next week about which one fits the goals of our project better, and would love any input on which might be best or why Open Street Maps was chosen for the Project rePhoto site a few years ago.
• Is it best to keep the Projects -> Subjects -> Entries pipeline? Otherwise, we could use tags to connect subjects to each other, which would serve the organizational purpose of projects. Why I’m excited about tags- many people, across geographic boundaries, can see each other’s work; for example, with a “home-improvement” tag, someone in Alaska and another in Brazil could both be building outdoor fireplaces, and get ideas from watching the evolution of each other’s projects. My only concerns- if a user is not required to put any tags on their subjects, we could have a lot of subjects that wouldn’t be tied to anything, making the process of organization and re-finding subjects a bit more tedious.

I’d love any feedback on what I’ve done and what should be done next, and happy Friday! 🙂