Sustaining Free Trade Through Narrative Diplomacy: New Zealand & the US

By Alexia Ross, MA Media and Strategic Communication ’22

New Zealand’s Prime Minister, Jacinda Ardern, is preparing for upcoming economic talks with the Biden White House.

New Zealand is a country that the global community does not often associate with international conflict. While not a regular participant in clashes between the world’s dominant forces, New Zealand faces increasing concerns about the impacts of transnational conflicts on its economy. New Zealand is highly import-dependent, with international trade making up over 60% of the country’s economic activities. With rising global tensions that threaten to impact trade routes, especially in the Indo-Pacific region, New Zealand officials are beginning to raise alarms about potential economic and supply implications.

New Zealand’s prime minister, Jacinda Ardern, is putting the protection of free trade at the top of the country’s foreign affairs agenda. She plans to meet with leaders from several key economic powers in the coming months. In early 2022, New Zealand cemented a free trade agreement with the United Kingdom that will bolster bilateral trade and reinforce strong relations between the countries that should, in theory, support continued economic collaboration even in times of international crisis.

Ardern is expected to meet with US officials in May to lock down another vital ally in free trade potentially. The US is New Zealand’s third-biggest trade partner, providing goods like cars and medical equipment. In preparation for this meeting, Ardern’s communication’s team should strategically leverage compelling narratives in her statement to the general US audience, thereby gaining public support for a bilateral trade deal between the two democratic nations.

An Opportunity Connection with US Public

Strategic narratives are an essential tool for appealing to potential allies, allowing governments to find common ground and values to nurture the relationship with the public of target nations. Ardern and her team could pursue a strong trade agreement to safeguard New Zealand’s trade-based economy by leveraging a number of narrative genres that both invoke a sense of shared identity between the nations and touch on some more US-centric narratives.

There are three main narrative structures that Ardern must consider in her speech:

  • Master and identity narratives that draw on a nation’s history and self-identifying characteristics;
  • System narratives that characterize a nation’s relationship with the rest of the world;
  • And issue narratives that address current events in the nations

The following chart showcases trade narratives that the US and New Zealand share, making them prime examples of values that Ardern should draw on when speaking to the US public.

Shared US & New Zealand Trade Narratives

Identity/Master NarrativeSystem NarrativeIssue Narrative
Leaders in production industry  

Participant in Global Markets
Global economic hierarchy  

Maintaining trans-national trade patterns

Free Trade  

Capitalism  

Alliance of Democratic Nations    

Rising China  

Growing concerns over China and its tensions with global powers  

Russia/Ukraine conflict impacting international trade, connotations for future  

Global supply chain challenges

A Path Forward

New Zealand is approaching this meeting with a backdrop of positive history with the US. A readout of a 2021 call between Biden and Ardern noted, “They discussed our interest in maintaining a free and open Indo-Pacific region, and President Biden underscored the enduring U.S. commitment to the region.”

When speaking to the US public in favor of a new trade deal, Prime Minister Ardern will want to draw out commonalities in free-market values. Ardern and her team should utilize a narrative of the importance of a “free, democratic, secure and prosperous world” in light of any range of global complications, and highlight how this partnership plays into the US’s existing frames of economic collaboration with a diverse grouping of nations

New Zealand can leverage current events as a tool for persuasion – arguing that firm partnerships can ensure that global trade is grounded and can remain stable in tumultuous circumstances. Tensions in the Indo-Pacific trade system due to conflict between China and other global superpowers, like the US, are of regional and global concern to Kiwis and Americans alike. By noting the risks for both the US and New Zealand’s economic freedoms if China was to disrupt trade in the region, Ardern could stoke strong emotional support for a trade agreement.

Utilizing a few more US-centric frames may also be helpful in developing public support for the partnership. For example, the US knows that it is a global superpower and acknowledges its role in global affairs. There is an expectation that US leaders will protect the reputation of the country as economic and humanitarian leaders. By touching on these identity narratives in her statement, Ardern would draw on the public’s desire to see its government showcase American values on the global stage.

Through the strategic use of narratives, Prime Minister Ardern could stoke pressure from a broad US audience, initiating an extra nudge that could push the Biden Administration to formalize a new trade agreement between the nations. For these reasons and more, Ardern’s messaging to the US public must be deliberate, highlighting why this deal is essential to both countries’ economic agendas.

For more on the topic by the author, please click here.


The opinions expressed in this blog are those of the author. They do not express the views of the Institute for Public Diplomacy and Global Communication or the George Washington University. 

Terrorism: Countering the Boko Haram extremist narratives in Nigeria

By Adeniyi Funsho, MA Media and Strategic Communications ’22

The latest bombing attack of the Abuja-Kaduna bound train by Boko Haram speaks to the continuous reign of terrorism, and extremist narratives against Nigeria.  The latest attack is coming off the back of countless others that spread from the northeast to as far as the south of Nigeria.  Nigeria, a former British colony has gone through several turbulent moments in its history as a nation leading to it becoming a democratic state, running a democratic system. As a nation, its master narrative is rooted in its diverse culture, tribes, religions, and hard-fought democracy. One threat to Nigeria’s master narrative is Boko Haram, an Islamic group founded by Mohammed Yusuf, which grew out of a cell of Muslim clergies and followers in Maiduguri, a state in the northeastern region of Nigeria. Since 2009, Boko Haram has been disrupting both the economic, and social life of Nigerians with a total of over 34,000 deaths, the latest killing of passengers traveling in a train bound for Kaduna adds to the increasing number of deaths by the terrorist group. 




Courtesy of Vanguard News: Abuja-Kaduna bound train attacked by Boko Haram killing over 15 passengers and over 200 wounded.

Boko Haram translates to ‘no to western education,’ and western ideologies describe the archetype of its master narrative as a group that is completely opposed to westernization. Unlike other ethnic militias, Boko Haram does not appropriate its ethnic Kanuri nationalist rhetoric to demand national representation for the northeast region within the Nigerian democratic system; instead, Boko Haram’s goal is the pursuit of an Islamic caliphate, a political structure, and a system of government based on Tawid ‘God’ law. Boko Haram is in opposition to what it calls ‘man-made’ laws of western democracy and the westernized culture under which the Nigerian system operates. Most importantly, however, we need to understand that Boko Haram’s narratives are founded on the “Salafi-jihadi” movement of Islam, a modern-day movement traceable to the middle east which developed roots connecting it to northern Nigeria. Their beliefs are predicated on a “Quran-only” doctrine, that strongly rejects westernized culture, and systems, owing to that reason the earliest people that first came into contact with the group branded them ‘Boko Haram’ a narrative that describes their utopia of ‘no to education’.

Specifically, Boko Haram’s Salafi-jihadi “Quran-only” identity reveals the ‘Islamist extremism’ ideology of the group, how they think, how they organize, the goals they pursue, and the reason why their narrative and activities are engrained in tough-talk and violent videos laundered through the media ecology. We get an understanding of their strategic narrative and the reason why they see an Islamic state as jihadism, and the only solution to resolve their issues with Nigeria. Boko Haram’s narratives for an Islamic state which previously appeared to have been ignored by the Nigerian state and international audiences got international attention when in April 2014, it ransacked the small town of Chibok, Maiduguri, and kidnapped 276 Chibok schoolgirls returning from school. In its messaging to Nigeria and the rest of the world, Boko Haram released a video via YouTube showing the girls as a ransom for the release of its members, and demands for an Islamic state. Nigeria’s counternarrative of peace and the use of Islamic commands on education as an appeal to Boko Haram to release the girls failed.  However,  it succeeded in destroying the conditions that make Boko Haram’s narratives plausible, communicable, and intelligible. It galvanized international and local nonstate actors, and media to frame the counternarrative of #BringBackOurGirls emphasizing the urgency for their unconditional release and their immutable right to education.



Courtesy of Channels News: Images of Chibok Schoolgirls that escaped from Boko Haram’s Kidnapping Camp

In order for Nigeria to counter Boko Haram’s extremist narratives, it should frame Boko Haram in a way that counters the group as following a false narrative of the ideology of true Islam. Framing should be crafted on peace and not violence, and Nigeria should heighten its frames on Islam as a religion that entertains peace ‘salam’ as its identity and one that abhors violence. Most importantly, Nigeria’s frames should heighten the sayings of the Islamic prophet on education and the ones whereby he implored its followers to live in peace and tolerance with their neighbors.

This should be supported by strategic use of the media ecology to counter the Boko Haram identity narrative of ‘no to education’. Nigeria’s counternarrative to Boko Haram should be based on the true Islamic authority of the prophet of Islam as he expressed his love for knowledge and enjoined his followers to seek education even if it were to be as far as China!

For more on the topic by the author, please click here.


The opinions expressed in this blog are those of the author. They do not express the views of the Institute for Public Diplomacy and Global Communication or the George Washington University. 

Happy New Year!

The Institute for Public Diplomacy and Global Communication welcomes all our students back in 2022! A new year brings fresh starts and hopes for many.

This year we warmly welcome IPDGC’s new director, Dr. William Youmans. Dr. Youmans is an associate professor at the George Washington University’s School of Media and Public Affairs. His area of expertise is media law and global communications, Middle Eastern politics and society; social movements, and Arab-American studies. More information on Dr. Youmans can be found here.

Through the hybrid work environment of 2021, IPDGC was able to organize virtual events such as the Walter Roberts Endowment Annual Lecture, present the 2021 Award for Congressional Leadership in Public Diplomacy, and host a Distinguished Humphrey Fellowship program for 15 media professionals from Eastern and Central Europe.

We look forward to more connections made with students, young professionals, and others interested in the fields of public diplomacy and global communication. In 2022, we will plan for more innovative events to support academic excellence in these fields. If you would like to know more about our past activities, please go here.

And PDx is back for a new season!

Our podcast kicks off with a new interviewer, graduate student Adeniyi Funsho, and an interview about Diversity and Inclusion in International Affairs.

The latest season of PDx is back!

PDx Interviewer Adeniyi Funsho, MA Media and Strategic Communications ’22

This season, our interviewer is Adeniyi Funsho, a graduate in the Media and Strategic Communications program at the School of Media and Public Affairs.

PDx – or Public Diplomacy Examined – is where we speak to the doers and thinkers in public diplomacy: the foreign service experts, the exchanges specialists, the academic observers and the supporters of international engagement and global communications.

This first podcast is with Professor Jonathan M. Walker, Senior Assistant Dean for Student Services, and Diversity, Equity and Inclusion at the GW Elliott School of International Affairs.

Professor Jonathan M. Walker,
GW Elliott School

In this conversation, Prof. Walker talks about the benefits of fixing the higher education system that would better serve underrepresented populations, and how diversity and inclusion will improve academic study and develop the professionals needed in the current world of International Affairs.

Please do enjoy the conversation >LISTEN HERE

Students walking past bust of George Washington and sign for GW University

Welcome Back, Students!

IPDGC is happy to welcome the new graduate students joining our cohort in the MA program in Global Communications at the Elliott School for International Affairs. There is much to learn, experience, and explore while you are on your graduate journey.

IPDGC’s Smart Power blog is a platform where you can share some of your academic and professional views. Please do let us know (at ipdgc@gwu.edu) if you would like to contribute to the blog or the Public Diplomacy Examined podcast.

We look forward to an inspired Fall 2021. #RaiseHigh!

Showcasing American Culture

Delivering the message of diversity and inclusion

For our final PDx podcast for the season, we take a look at how the U.S. takes urban dance culture to other communities around the world. SMPA graduate student Victoria Makanjuola talks to Junious Brickhouse about cultural diplomacy and the challenges of sharing about representation, diversity, and inclusion – which is still a work-in-progress in the United States.

Junious Brickhouse is an internationally established, award-winning urban dance educator, choreographer, community leader, and cultural preservationist with over 20 years of experience in the field of expression and dance.

As the director of Next Level – an initiative of the U.S. Department of State’s Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs and is administered by Meridian International Center and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill – Junious is responsible for leading programs which bring people together in programs that encourages greater understanding through music.

Next Level has programs where teams of MCs, DJs, hip hop dancers, beatmakers, beatboxers, and artists conduct public concerts, interactive performances with local (foreign) musicians, lecture demonstrations, workshops, and jam sessions with diverse audiences.

He is also the founder and executive director of Urban Artistry (link to Urban Artistry: http://urbanartistry.org/), non-profit organization dedicated to the performance and preservation of art forms inspired by the urban experience in Silver Spring, Md.

Please enjoy our last podcast for the season and have a fantastic summer! Click Here for the podcast.


Head pic of graduate student Victoria Makanjuola

Victoria recently launched her own podcast, Feel Your Feelingz – for Generation Z- made by a Gen Z’er! Its purpose is to enlighten, educate, and express to the world how Victoria’s generation is coping with mental health issues.

She talks to guests about 2020, COVID-19, stress and anxiety, race, education, and more! It’s not just talk as Victoria and her guests also try to offer listeners some solutions. This podcast was created to reinforce the fact that the voice of Gen Z matters. Join Victoria to FEEL YOUR FEELINGZ together!

Click Here to learn more how the Feel You Feelingz is now part of the first-ever Mental Health Action Day on Thursday, May 20, 2021.

And thank you again to Victoria Makanjuola – Class of 2021, MA in Media and Strategic Communication. We wish you success always!

Creating connections with cultural programs

By Sydney Teabout

For this PDx podcast, GW senior Sydney Teabout speaks to Nancy Szalwinski, Director for Cultural Programs at the US Department of State.

Ms. Szalwinski has had almost two decades of experience with the U.S. Foreign Service. Her experiences have taken her to several posts in Latin America and also to Eastern Europe and Australia.

In the conversation, Sydney learns more about the goals of cultural programs and how they are part of U.S. public diplomacy. 

Enjoy the PDx episode through this LINK.

Sydney Teabout is a student in the SMPA 3350 Public Diplomacy class taught by Public Diplomacy Fellow Emilia A. Puma. She is a senior studying Journalism and Mass Communication as well as American Studies.

The opinions expressed in this blog are those of the author. They do not express the views of the Institute for Public Diplomacy and Global Communication or the George Washington University.

Fostering connections for a peaceful, prosperous world

By Adam Esrig

“I am convinced that increased participation by dedicated Americans in international exchanges will help to achieve our common hope for a durable and just peace.”

— President John F. Kennedy, 1961
Robert Ogburn, Director of the Office of Citizen Exchanges, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, US State Department

In this PDx episode, SMPA undergraduate student Adam Esrig speaks with Robert Ogburn, Director of the Office of Citizen Exchanges, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, United States Department of State.

Examining the impact of cultural and educational diplomacy, Mr. Ogburn discusses the importance of exchange programs in the context of today’s current events.

Enjoy this PDx podcast: Fostering Connections for a Peaceful, Prosperous World

Adam Esrig is a student in the SMPA 3350 Public Diplomacy class taught by Public Diplomacy Fellow Emilia A. Puma. He is an undergraduate student in Political Science and Political Communication, Class of 2023.

The opinions expressed in this podcast are those of the interviewer. They do not express the views of the Institute for Public Diplomacy and Global Communication or the George Washington University.

A relook: The Public Diplomacy of the Modern Olympic Games and China’s Soft Power Strategy

By Grace Christensen, BA Political Communication

Beijing’s National Stadium (Bird’s Nest) lighted up by fireworks and the Olympic flame during the opening ceremony of the Olympic Games Beijing 2008|
International Olympic Committee (IOC) / Richard Juilliart

Despite claims by the Olympic Charter that “No kind of demonstration or political, religious or racial propaganda is permitted in the Olympic areas,” the Olympic Games have almost never remained apolitical. In fact, for most countries, the Games provide the perfect opportunity to gain influence in the world, amplify their brands on an international stage and make, or remake their reputations. When given the chance to host the Olympic Games, these powers are only magnified. While hosting the Games is a high-risk endeavor, it is one that all major powers will likely tackle at some point in their histories. One country, in particular, has felt this pressure unlike any other in recent history: China. With Beijing set to be the first city to host both the Summer (2008) and Winter Games (2022) and the second capital city to ever host the Winter Games, China is uniquely positioned to promote its power to the rest of the world. While Nicholas Cull provides an in-depth analysis of China’s soft power strategy in his 2008 work “The Public Diplomacy of the Modern Olympic Games and China’s Soft Power Strategy,” the world has changed dramatically in the last decade, and the 2022 Beijing Games will bring with them an entirely new host of issues and image challenges for the emerging superpower.

Despite this, Cull’s analysis of China’s soft power strategy on the eve of the 2008 Summer Games and the subsequent recommendations he provides can still largely be applied to China’s upcoming Winter Games. While China’s image problems may have shifted from lingering concern over protests in Tiananmen Square to recent protests in Hong Kong, Cull’s guidance leading up to the Games can still be just as valuable to China as it was the first time around. Specifically, Beijing would be wise to harness the power of the Olympic Games to form the “ultimate distraction story” to divert attention from the world’s negative media coverage of the country. Most importantly, however, Cull recommends honesty. Whether they accept it or not, China will be known as it is, not as it wishes to be. Since the world will draw its own conclusions regarding the new China regardless of how the country feels about this matter, Cull suggests that they sit back and enjoy the Games.

Ultimately, however, this plan did not serve China quite as well as Cull had predicted it would. Between boycotts from prominent politicians and celebrities, security concerns following civil unrest in Tibet and alarm over the high levels of air pollution the Games produced, China’s “ultimate distraction story” ended up being much less distracting and a lot more revealing. With over a year of protests in Hong Kong now plaguing front pages across the globe and the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic leaving negative stereotypes circulating around the world, China’s 2022 Games could be their last shot to alter their image on such a grand stage for a long time to come. While the country has largely succeeded in the fight against COVID-19, recent boycott threats could ruin any chance China has at improving its public image. Moving forward, the best public diplomacy strategy for China is to be honest about the problems it faces. The power of sports diplomacy should not be understated, and with so much still depending on the unfolding of the competition, China still has a good chance of remaking its reputation this coming winter. While China is facing many new problems this Olympic season, there is also a huge potential for new victories.

Grace Christensen is a student in the SMPA 3350 Public Diplomacy class taught by Public Diplomacy Fellow Emilia A. Puma. She is a senior in the School of Media and Public Affairs majoring in Political Communication.

The opinions expressed in this blog are those of the author. They do not express the views of the Institute for Public Diplomacy and Global Communication or the George Washington University.

The Kashmir Standstill and Conflicting Identity Narratives

By Kayla Malcy, MA International Affairs, 2022

The conflict between India and Pakistan over Kashmir has existed since partition in 1947. Kashmir has precipitated 2 of the 3 Indo-Pakistani wars and a slew of militant groups and attacks on both sides of the line of control. Alongside the physical violence of the Kashmir conflict, there has been a clear formation of national narratives to suit each country’s objectives. If India and Pakistan plan to move towards sustained peace, they will have to reconcile their opposing identity narratives and repair their relationships with the Kashmiri people.

 The conflict explained

The disputed area of Kashmir

           The partition of British India placed Kashmir in a nearly impossible position. While the Maharaja of Kashmir, part of the Hindu minority ruling a Muslim majority, wished for independence, both India and Pakistan wanted Kashmir within their own borders. The Maharaja agreed to join the Indian state in exchange for protection from Pakistani forces, instigating the first Indo-Pakistani war as well as the cascade of conflicts that followed. The current line of control divides the Kashmiri territory into Indian administered Kashmir and Pakistan administered Kashmir.

Rising tensions

           With talks coming to a standstill in 2016, Kashmir has seen a marked increase in violent conflict. Attacks by militant groups against the Indian military were seen in both 2017 and 2018. Indian security forces clashed with both militants and demonstrators. An attack on an Indian Army convoy by the terrorist group Jaish-e-Mohammad, associated with the Pakistani Inter-Service Intelligence (ISI), killed 40 soldiers in February of 2019 reigniting the prolonged conflict between India and Pakistan.

In August 2019, India moved thousands of troops into Kashmir. The Indian government then revoked Article 370, which gave Jammu and Kashmir its partial autonomy and statehood, and 35A, which provided residents privileges such as land ownership. Cellular and landline services were shut down to all of Kashmir and India imposed the longest ever internet shut down in a democracy.

Pakistani National Identity Narratives

Pakistan’s founding identity as a safe haven for Muslims reinforces the sentiment that Kashmir, with a population roughly 60% Muslim, belongs with it. Arguments over the meaning of Pakistan’s name also contribute to its identity. In Pakistan’s official language of Urdu, ‘Pak’ means pure. ‘Pak’ then combined with ‘-stan’ forms the meaning of ‘the land abounding in the pure’ or as it is often translated, ‘the land of the pure’. An alternate reading of Pakistan’s name is as an acronym for the four northern states of former British India: Punjab, Afghania, Kashmir, and Sindh. In both cases, the retention of Kashmiri territory is critical to the Pakistani national identity.

A large facet of both the Pakistani and Indian identity narratives is opposition to the enemy. For Pakistan, riling up anti-Indian sentiment can distract from other political issues. In their view, India is a tyrant abusing the Muslim Kashmiris, which Pakistan, as a Muslim country, has the duty to protect. Additionally, the idea that India has never fully accepted partition and is simply waiting to take Pakistan back is thrown out to heighten Pakistani feelings of defensiveness.

Indian National Identity Narratives

India’s population is majority Hindu and while the Indian constitution guarantees freedom of religion, the governing party, the BJP, is Hindu nationalist at its core. These ideals and the construction of Muslims as ‘the other’ puts Indian national identity in direct opposition to Pakistani national identity.  India takes enormous pride in being world’s largest democracy. This narrative of democratic idealism has often shielded India from criticism among western powers. Another aspect of Indian identity is self-reliance which can be traced back to Gandhi. Even today PM Modi’s platform contains five pillars of self-reliance.

            Just as Pakistani politicians use anti-Indian sentiment, Indian politicians use the same tactic of riling up anti-Pakistan sentiment in order to distract from other political issues. In fact, 2019 Pew Research surveys show that 76% of Indian’s see Pakistan as a threat; only 7% do not view Pakistan as a threat. Claims of Pakistani sponsored violence in Kashmir never fail to anger the populace of India and redirect attention from other issues. India sees itself as the rightful heir to Kashmir due to the Hindu Maharaja’s decision to join India. India focuses in on this claim in their attempts to delegitimize Pakistani claims to Kashmir.

Battle of the Narratives

These conflicting identity narratives play out in Kashmir, especially the religious ones. Pakistani claims that India’s recent actions are proof of India targeting Muslim populations in Kashmir and stripping them of their rights. India claims that Pakistan is a hotbed for Islamic terrorism and is directly responsible for militant attacks against Indian security forces in Kashmir. Calling out the other’s actions in this way only serves to increase blame and widen the gap in dialogue.

The weight of both narratives changed with the 2019 events and the release of the 2019 UNHCR report on Kashmir, which concerned abuses by security forces on both sides of the line of control. With the repeal of Article 370 and subsequent shutdown of internet services and Kashmir lock down, India has lost some of the legitimacy its democratic narrative carried before. Revoking Article 35A has also caused concerns that the BJP is attempting to change the religious demographics of Kashmir by opening up property ownership to the non-Kashmiri Hindu majority in India. These actions coupled with recent announcement of India’s democratic backsliding further solidified the Pakistani narrative of an unjust India with no respect for Muslims as an occupational force, not a rightful ruler.

While opinions within Kashmir remain divided as to whom Kashmir belongs, if anyone at all, movements to reinstate Article 370 and, alternatively, to separate from India continue in Kashmir. The Indian and Pakistani focus on messaging to the opposing government has long sidelined the Kashmiri people leaving their voices unheard. If any progress is to be made both India and Pakistan will need to address, at a minimum, the aspects of their identity narratives based on the fear of the other.

For a detailed analysis by the author on the subject, Click Here.

The opinions expressed in this blog are those of the author. They do not express the views of the Institute for Public Diplomacy and Global Communication or the George Washington University. 

Main photo: Authorities clash with demonstrators, provided by Kashmir Global