SURE Stories: Exploring Public Attitudes Toward School Vouchers in a Religious School Context

The following blog post was written by fellow UHPer and Fall 2023 SURE Award recipient, Alex Lucero (Political Science with a Public Policy focus, ’24). Read on about Alex’s research and how he plans to utilize the SURE Award funding to further expand upon his experience!

In 2022, the United States Supreme Court decided Carson v. Makin. Maine had enacted a tuition assistance program for parents who live in areas not serviced by a particular school district. Under the program, parents could choose the school they would like their child to attend, and the state would contribute funds toward the cost of the school’s tuition. Parents could send their child to any accredited private school but were prohibited from using the program toward religious, “nonsectarian” schools. The Court decided that Maine’s “nonsectarian” requirement for an otherwise generally available tuition assistance program violates the First Amendment. In light of this ruling, policymakers and voters are faced with two choices: to either support voucher programs with the knowledge that some families will use public funds at religious private schools or to oppose school voucher programs altogether.

For my senior thesis project, I designed a survey to test whether presenting voting-age Americans with information about the inclusion of religious private schools within a school voucher program affects their attitudes toward state-wide school voucher programs. The survey also aims to test whether the attitudes of voting-age Americans are further impacted by information about the specific religion of a religious private school included within the program. This survey will present respondents with a fictional newspaper vignette about Liam and Dana Bagher, who hope to send their child to an unconventional private school. The survey utilizes a cross-sectional design, where each group is told that the school is either a secular Montessori school, a religious Protestant school, a religious Muslim school, or a religious Jewish school. All four stories emphasize that while these schools meet state standards, the students will receive a non-traditional education in life.

To ensure my results are representative, and my conclusions are generalizable, I will contract with a professional online polling company. With the help of the SURE award and funding provided by the Loeb Institute for Religious Freedom at George Washington University, I hope to gather a survey pool of roughly 500-1000 respondents. Designing this survey has taught me a lot about creating survey questions. Additionally, going through the IRB review process has given me an interesting look into the many important ethical considerations that go into designing a survey. My research will allow policymakers to understand the political feasibility of advocating for school voucher legislation, given that policymakers can no longer exclude families who wish to use these benefits toward religious education.

Interested in applying for your own SURE Award funding? Find out more about the application process here!