Student Spotlight: Mohammad Fayaz Yourish

Here’s a PDx interview with GW graduate student Mohammad Fayaz Yourish. He is in his final year of the MA program in Global Communication, graduating this December. As an international student who has studied in India and Italy, he shares his experiences of coming to the U.S. for graduate school. In the podcast, Fayaz reflects on his time at the George Washington University and living in the nation’s capital.

“Diversity of the GW campus is very important and I think every student must make the best of that while being at GW.”

Mohammad Fayaz Yourish, MA Global Communication, Dec 2024

From his very first semester, Fayaz has given a lot of support to IPDGC events and GW student-focused activities such as the Walter Roberts Annual Lectures which feature leading voices in global communication or public diplomacy; hosting the State Department’s International Women of Courage panel at GW, and career talks with alums of the Global Communication MA program.

Fayaz has also been working on student engagement which means attending conferences like the Global Ties US National Meeting where public diplomacy practitioners, community organizations and government agencies gather – taking the opportunity to talk to attendees about the Global Communication program at the Elliott School.

Listen to the interview with Fayaz.

Alumni Spotlight: Laura Brendle

By Alexis Posel, IPDGC Communications Student Assistant

Laura Brendle graduated from the M.A.Global Communication graduate program in 2018. She was the recipient of that year’s Student Public Diplomacy Award which recognized her efforts in public diplomacy studies.

She currently works at Webrepublic, a digital advertising agency in Switzerland, where Laura is originally from. Her academic journey in the Global Communications program has taken her into the world of international marketing.

Tell me about how you chose to come to GW for the MA program in Global Communications. And what are you doing after your graduation?

I began my program at GW in 2016. It was a very interesting year, politically. You can’t hear it from my voice, but I’m actually Swiss, not American.

I had been in the UK and working in the film industry over there at the time, watching the US election happen. I always had this interest in global politics, and also in the politics of the U.S. So, that’s how I chose to come to GW for my master’s degree in Global Communication. I think that kind of sets the scene for my kind of non-traditional pathway in both directions.

After graduation, I began working in the digital advertising industry. I got into that (job) because I of a class I had taken at the School of Media and Public Affairs. And this was where I met my future boss – they had been a guest lecturer in one of the classes. So, I worked for the digital agency Targeted Victory for a year after graduating.

Later, I returned to Switzerland, where I began working at another digital advertising agency, Webrepublic – no longer focused on politics, (but) on all aspects of advertising.

While I’m not the traditional candidate to be talking about why the Global Communication program as I think a lot of people may not want to go on the path that I’ve gone, I think this MA program has definitely helped me in my current industry: learning from people with different experiences and analyzing the way that people think – especially in the political communication aspect – knowing how to influence or how the media influences, are all things that are beneficial to know.

Looking back on your time at GW, which classes do you think have helped you figure out what you wanted to do?

What I think I have gained overall from the Global Communication program is communication (skills). Getting your point across succinctly, using these skills of persuasion, and understanding the person that you’re speaking to. Those are kind of the strategies that I still employ in advertising.

The class on Strategic Politics left an impression on me about using humor strategically. It was a really interesting class combining comedy and politics – learning how to use humor in communication to get your point across. It was something so different that could connect all my interests as I was working on the comedy side of things while working in the film industry.

As I mentioned, in joining Targeted Victory, I was a Republican public communications, PR and advertising firm. I went into that because GW can be a very liberal bubble for a European person, not understanding the perspective of why Trump happened. So, I was curious to get into a space with Republicans and figure out what happened there. That was my motivation, but then I fell in love with advertising through working there.

Another experience I want to mention is the Capstone project at the Elliot School of International Affairs. My group brought together different knowledge and skills – one person was focused on trafficking issues, and another was focused on international women’s policies. I brought in the global communication aspect. We traveled to South Korea and interviewed North Korean refugees, in particular, refugees who had been trafficked across the border with China.

I love that the Global Communication program could give all these different touch points with all these different people from different areas of expertise and help translate things into a community communications perspective.

Global Comm grad student receives I/We award

Congratulations to Global Comm graduate student Rehana Paul for being a recipient of this year’s International Women of Elliott Awards!

The International Women of Elliott (I/WE) Student Awards, established by the International Women of Elliott Executive Circle, provides recipients with financial support for various programs, activities, and needs related to their academic program (including conference and tuition fees and unpaid internships) if they have demonstrated commitment to advancing women’s roles in international affairs worldwide.

As a recipient of the International Women of Elliott Award, I am empowered to continue studying the role of women in countering violent extremism, as well as the impact of CVE/CT campaigns on marginalized women. This award will allow me to fully devote myself to pursuing my MA in Global Communications, as well as working on the International Religious Freedom Reports at the State Department. I am honored to join a community devoted to promoting women’s leadership, and look forward to learning from the strong women who compose it.

-Rehana Paul

Happy New Year!

The Institute for Public Diplomacy and Global Communication welcomes all our students back in 2022! A new year brings fresh starts and hopes for many.

This year we warmly welcome IPDGC’s new director, Dr. William Youmans. Dr. Youmans is an associate professor at the George Washington University’s School of Media and Public Affairs. His area of expertise is media law and global communications, Middle Eastern politics and society; social movements, and Arab-American studies. More information on Dr. Youmans can be found here.

Through the hybrid work environment of 2021, IPDGC was able to organize virtual events such as the Walter Roberts Endowment Annual Lecture, present the 2021 Award for Congressional Leadership in Public Diplomacy, and host a Distinguished Humphrey Fellowship program for 15 media professionals from Eastern and Central Europe.

We look forward to more connections made with students, young professionals, and others interested in the fields of public diplomacy and global communication. In 2022, we will plan for more innovative events to support academic excellence in these fields. If you would like to know more about our past activities, please go here.

And PDx is back for a new season!

Our podcast kicks off with a new interviewer, graduate student Adeniyi Funsho, and an interview about Diversity and Inclusion in International Affairs.

The latest season of PDx is back!

PDx Interviewer Adeniyi Funsho, MA Media and Strategic Communications ’22

This season, our interviewer is Adeniyi Funsho, a graduate in the Media and Strategic Communications program at the School of Media and Public Affairs.

PDx – or Public Diplomacy Examined – is where we speak to the doers and thinkers in public diplomacy: the foreign service experts, the exchanges specialists, the academic observers and the supporters of international engagement and global communications.

This first podcast is with Professor Jonathan M. Walker, Senior Assistant Dean for Student Services, and Diversity, Equity and Inclusion at the GW Elliott School of International Affairs.

Professor Jonathan M. Walker,
GW Elliott School

In this conversation, Prof. Walker talks about the benefits of fixing the higher education system that would better serve underrepresented populations, and how diversity and inclusion will improve academic study and develop the professionals needed in the current world of International Affairs.

Please do enjoy the conversation >LISTEN HERE

Students walking past bust of George Washington and sign for GW University

Welcome Back, Students!

IPDGC is happy to welcome the new graduate students joining our cohort in the MA program in Global Communications at the Elliott School for International Affairs. There is much to learn, experience, and explore while you are on your graduate journey.

IPDGC’s Smart Power blog is a platform where you can share some of your academic and professional views. Please do let us know (at ipdgc@gwu.edu) if you would like to contribute to the blog or the Public Diplomacy Examined podcast.

We look forward to an inspired Fall 2021. #RaiseHigh!

Review: Academic study on the Fulbright Program and US public diplomacy

By Colleen Cavanaugh, BA Political Communication, ’22

Molly Bettie’s article “Ambassadors unaware: the Fulbright Program and American public diplomacy” explores a continuous historical tension between the value of the Fulbright Program as an American information activity versus a purely educational-cultural pursuit. The title of the article harkens back to an essay written by a Fulbright grantee who described herself as an “ambassador unaware,” which highlights the complicated role the participants in the government funded academic program play. Grantees are expected to fulfill their own research goals, while also acting as de facto diplomats who are expected to be representatives of their home country. Members of the program are never briefed or trained on how to facilitate the cultural exchange expected of them. Bettie describes it as a form of private international relations, making it hard for research to effectively and holistically measure the impacts of this exchange. 

This is where the central negotiation between information and educational-cultural perspectives arises. The information perspective views the Fulbright Program as part of public diplomacy in which participants become another form of media with a target audience. This approach stems from the belief that a tax funded program should reap a common benefit. The educational-cultural side of the argument views the exchanges that take place as inherently valuable and believes they should remain free of governmental influence. This preservation of academic integrity was favored by the program’s founder Senator J. William Fulbright as well. 

Bettie goes on to provide three examples illustrative of this consistent tension. After World War II and into the Cold War, Senator Fulbright was wary of the Fulbright Program being conflated with propagandistic efforts, vehemently opposing its potential placement under the USIA. Later, in 1975 during the Cold War thaw, the Stanton Report reevaluated the organization of overseas bureaucracies and proposed a combination of the information and cultural aspects, given their apparent overlap in the field. However, this was not established, as the Carter administration reorganized and established the International Communication Agency. Finally, in 1999 the USIA was dismantled, and the Fulbright Program was moved under the Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs in the Department of State. 

Through this long and winding history, one can see the various internal and institutional complications implicated in how the Fulbright Program should operate. It begs the question: Is there room for both informational and educational-cultural involvement? It is reasonable to suggest a balance between the two. The informational factor gives the program a purpose distinct from that of private education and warrants government funding. The educational-cultural basis lends neutrality and legitimacy. Bettie concludes the two can work in a mutually beneficial way. While I do not find this idea particularly problematic, I contend that the Fulbright Program should be separate from information activities and kept under the educational-cultural umbrella as much as possible. Though I understand this is nearly impossible under the current bureaucratic system, I agree with Senator Fulbright’s initial intentions. Individual grantees are not signing up to be ambassadors, and it is misguided to think that academic work is not valuable enough for its own sake. Yes, grantees will be facilitators of cultural exchange between their host and home countries, but this does not mean they should be required to adhere to the public diplomacy vision or aims of the United States. Attaching strings to educational programs seems like a slippery slope that could border on censorship. Bettie states that our overseas counterparts also support the educational-cultural approach, and their input should be respected. The initial fears of this exchange being seen as propaganda are well-founded, so when possible, the Fulbright Program should consider education and exchange on an interpersonal level, rather than a governmental level, of greatest import.  

References – Bettie, Molly. “Ambassadors unaware: the Fulbright Program and American public diplomacy.” Journal of Transatlantic Studies, vol. 13, no. 4, 2015, pp. 358-372.

Colleen Cavanaugh is a student in the SMPA 3350 Public Diplomacy class taught by Public Diplomacy Fellow Emilia A. Puma. She is a junior in the School of Media and Public Affairs majoring in Political Communications.

The opinions expressed in this blog are those of the author. They do not express the views of the Institute for Public Diplomacy and Global Communication or the George Washington University.

Sharing America’s stories – the Fulbright program

Improving US intercultural relations, communications, and understanding through exchange

By Gabriella Armonda, BA Political Communications, May 2021.

On January 27, 2021, the GW Institute for Public Diplomacy and Global Communication presented Senator John Boozman, (R-Ark.) with the 2021 Walter Roberts Award for Congressional Leadership in Public Diplomacy.

At the sme time, the Walter Roberts Endowment awarded a $5,000 grant to Global Ties Arkansas for a micro-project focused on supporting alumni exchanges; the grant supports the continued growth for Public Diplomacy programs. I helped put together the virtual webinar for the award ceremony.

This award was in recognition of Sen. Boozman’s ongoing support of the Fulbright program and other educational exchanges. Historically, educational exchanges have been a strategic tool in public diplomacy, and a prime component of America’s “soft power.” Soft power, first defined by Joseph Nye, is the ability to influence the behaviors of those in other countries to produce desired results. Unlike other forms of international diplomacy, soft power bypasses the use of coercion and force. Much of soft power rests on constructive educational exchanges. In fact, the sponsorship of programs like the Fulbright program has allowed America to improve intercultural relations, communications, and understanding between itself and other countries. The Fulbright program awards highly competitive scholarships to U.S. students, foreign students, teachers, and scholars to study, research, teach, or use their skills abroad. This program is one way that the U.S. can build understanding and partnerships and help us to exercise our soft power. 

For many practitioners of public diplomacy, the Fulbright Program serves as a beacon of hope for America’s future by improving our relationships with our allies and adversaries. History has shown that these educational exchanges, without a doubt, have strengthened national relationships, made lasting connections, and produced a positive impact on U.S. relations with the outside world. In other words, educational exchanges help diplomacy occur more efficiently at all levels of foreign affairs by facilitating understanding and communication.

One of the most important aspects of educational exchanges is the personal relationships that form from a continued dialogue between Americans and foreigners. Without funding from Congress’s annual appropriations bill, the United States would not be able to project and spread its image, ideals, or beliefs. Educational exchanges are one of the most important avenues for ensuring that American culture and society are experienced first-hand, and we hope, are appreciated and more respected. Educational exchanges build allies and leave adversaries with fewer incentives to work against the United States on foreign diplomacy issues. Public diplomacy is not constrained to a singular form. Instead, it has various shapes and fashions from the arts, drama, and sports to science, math, and languages. Ultimately, without support from U.S. senators like Sen. Boozman, who prioritized the expansion of educational exchanges, American diplomacy would struggle and we would waste an excellent source of our soft power. The world is influenced through coercion but also soft power, which is why funding programs that focus on educational exchanges is essential to the continued strength of American democracy. 

Gabriella Armonda is a student in the SMPA 3350 Public Diplomacy class taught by Public Diplomacy Fellow Emilia A. Puma. She is a senior in the School of Media and Public Affairs majoring in Political Communications with a minor in Spanish.

The opinions expressed in this blog are those of the author. They do not express the views of the Institute for Public Diplomacy and Global Communication or the George Washington University.

Gender Equality in International Affairs

Building a better approach through research and practice

In our latest PDx episode, interviewer and SMPA grad student Victoria Makanjuola talks to Dr. Shirley Graham the director for the Gender Equality Initiative in International Affairs at the Elliott School of International Affairs. The Gender Equality Initiative in International Affairs (GEIA) is a program to encourage gender equality in all areas of global affairs, international development, political power, military strength, and government leadership.

Recognizing the absence of women from decision-making and institutional structures, is a way to acknowledge the need to include women in government and political power. Women can effectively contribute their experiences and expertise to global politics which were once traditionally regarded as male domains.

Dr. Graham shares highlights from the initiative and how the idea of gender inclusion has been  gaining acceptance in academia and in practice.

Listen to the podcast HERE.