Apply to Be a Peer Advisor!

Honors Peer Advisors are an integral part of UHP advising, providing mentorship to new Honors students and providing a student perspective for the Honors community at large. They advise on honors experiences, classes, housing, and all the facets of life at GW as a Honors student.
Are you interested in applying to be an Honors Peer Advisor? Applications are now open!

  • Apply here if you’re applying as a new Honors Peer Advisors
  • Apply here if you’re applying as a returning Honors Peer Advisors
  • Apply here if you’re interested in a leadership positionwith the Honors Peer Advisors. Please note that leadership candidates should also fill out a regular application.

The application deadline is Monday, January 23. Please contact uhppeers@gwu.edu with questions regarding the application.

Cars, Rapid Transit, Elevators and Skyscrapers and the Fast Growth of Cities in Poor Countries [Research Assistant]

Professor: Remi Jedwab
Department: Economics and ESIA
Title: Cars, Rapid Transit, Elevators and Skyscrapers and the Fast Growth of Cities in Poor Countries
Description: Urbanization and economic development have been coupled throughout history. However, the post-war period has witnessed the very fast growth of poor megacities in developing nations. Dhaka, Karachi, Kinshasa, Lagos, Manila, and Mexico City comprise some of the largest cities on the planet today. By 2030, most of the largest cities in the world will be located in poor countries. The prevalence of poor mega-cities today counters historical experience. In the past, the largest agglomerations in the world were located in the most advanced economies (e.g. London, New York, Paris, and Tokyo).
Countries usually urbanize when they industrialize. If agglomeration promotes economic growth, urbanization has a positive effect on growth. There is thus a virtuous circle between development and urbanization, as shown by the historical experience of Europe, North America and East Asia. In many developing countries, however, urbanization has deviated from this pattern. Many developing countries have high rates of urbanization with little significant industry. What has driven the urbanization process in
these countries, in the absence of industry? If their cities have a different origin, does it matter for economic development?
Our major hypothesis is that technological advances in both urban housing (e.g., elevators, high-rise buildings and skyscrapers) and urban transportation (e.g., electric and underground railways, motor buses, private cars and highways) have allowed cities to become much larger for developing countries since the mid-20th century. In particular, these new technologies have allowed cities to absorb more people, whether “vertically” (in tall residential and office buildings) or “horizontally” (by accelerating suburbanization and/or creating polycentric cities).
Prakash Loungani (Senior Manager of the Research Department of the International Monetary Fund https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prakash_Loungani), Professor Anthony Yezer (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Yezer) and I (http://home.gwu.edu/~jedwab/) want to use a theoretical model of urban economics and empirical methods to document and quantify the role of these
new technologies in the fast urbanization of the developing world. For this project, we need to collect data on the evolution of these technologies and cities across space and over time. In particular, we need to
find data on the respective evolution of: (i) elevator speeds, (ii) building heights, (iii) modes of urban transportation, (iv) city sizes, (v) city shapes, (vi) buildable area, (vii) housing, (viii) slums, (ix) GDP and wages, and (x) prices, for enough cities in the world over time. With this data at our disposal, we will be able to use our model to simulate the effects of these technological changes on the fast growth of cities, in
developed countries where these technologies are widely used, but also in developing countries where these technologies are increasingly used.
Lastly, we will ask whether cities in developing countries are really “inefficient” today. As of now, most cities in developing countries are very spread out, so they are more horizontal than vertical. But for these
cities to become taller, and potentially more sustainable, they will need elevators that work, meaning fewer power failures than they currently experience. These questions are especially important for governments in developing countries, as they have to deal with the very fast growth of their cities and the associated problems of slum expansion and traffic jams. We will present the results of this research at the seminars and conferences of various multilateral and bilateral aid agencies in Washington D.C., as they are particularly interested in learning how to help developing countries with their urban issues. One of the team members is the Senior Manager of the Research Department of the International Monetary Fund, so that is a great opportunity for any student interested in international development.
Duties: The RA will help us collect data on the respective evolution of: (i) elevator speeds, (ii) building heights, (iii) modes of urban transportation, (iv) city sizes, (v) city shapes, (vi) buildable area, (vii) housing, (viii) slums, (ix) GDP and wages, and (x) prices, for enough cities in the world over time. The RA will help us find historical sources (encyclopedias, books, academic articles, etc.) documenting these for some cities and some years, and compile the information in excel files that we will then use to establish some stylized facts and determine parameters that we will use in our analysis. In terms of time commitment/credits, both 4-6 hours per week (2 credits) and 7-9 hours per week (3 credits) work.
Time commitment: 4-6 hours per week (average)
Credit hour option*: 2
Submit Cover Letter/Resume to: jedwab@gwu.edu
*If credit is sought, all registration deadlines and requirements must be met.  Students selected to be research assistants should contact Catherine Chandler at cbrady@gwu.edu whether they intend to pursue credit or not.

The Extra-Curricular: PLSA Publications – The GW Undergraduate Law Review & GW Justice Journal

The following blog post was written by peer advisor Zach, a CCAS junior studying history, law and society, and jazz studies. Zach is also on the pre-law track and wrote an amazing blog post last year about all things pre-law at GW! You can learn more about Zach here.
Happy finals week, UHPers! Today, I’m taking a break from finals studying and paper writing to tell you all about an incredible, unique opportunity on GW’s campus for anyone interested in law, policy, politics, history, philosophy, and the like. I’m referring to the two publications of the GW Pre-Law Student Association, the Undergraduate Law Review and the GW Justice Journal. Both provide incredible opportunities for students with great ideas to get them published in a professional platform that can be marketed for jobs, internships, etc.
The GW Undergraduate Law Review (ULR) is the premier publication of the Pre-Law Student Association and one of only about twenty law reviews of its kind in the nation. Writers and editors apply within the first three weeks of the academic year and work throughout the year to research, draft, revise, and publish their pieces. Each year, the ULR publishes approximately ten to fifteen full-length law review articles, composed and edited entirely by GW students, while most other undergraduate law reviews solicit articles from the general public, including other student authors around the country. We additionally pride ourselves on the use of Bluebook citation standards—the preferred citation system throughout the legal academy and profession, and a skill generally not taught until your first year of law school.
Do you want to suggest a new, more practical interpretation of the Mann Act? Do you think that the United States should do more to regulate offshore banking? Do you believe that the Supreme Court should have had a more active role in the Civil War? The ULR is the perfect place to spend a semester researching and then publish your work. We utilize a thorough process that you’ll be hard-pressed to find anywhere else, and it’s a process that produces high-quality, polished work at the end of the semester. And, yes, you can write about anything you want—all of the above examples are topics from last year’s ULR!
The final publication is housed in Gelman Library, on the shelves of the American Bar Association Library, and catalogued in the Library of Congress. So, yes, it’s REAL publication! This year’s team is already assembled and well on its way towards the April publication deadline, but stay tuned for next year’s application process! You can peruse past editions of the ULR at http://www.gwprelaw.com/undergraduate-law-review-1 (check out my article on page 217 of last year’s edition!).
However, if you want to find a place to get your ideas out there RIGHT NOW, the GW Justice Journal may be the place for you. The Justice Journal is the PLSA’s blog for legal commentary, with pieces published by a staff of writers as well as guest writers. With the Justice Journal, you’ll have the opportunity to form your opinions into a succinct article and have a staff of editors revise and comment on your piece before publication.
Topics for the Justice Journal tend to be more current-event focused, but run the gamut from every end of the legal commentary spectrum. Recent articles have dealt with the flaws of the electoral college system, racial discrimination in jury selection, foreign NGOs in China, and prosecutorial oversight. Read them for yourself at http://www.gwjusticejournal.com, and email gwplsa@gmail.com if you’re interested in getting involved!
Additionally, the Justice Journal assembles its best pieces every year in the Legal Annual Review, which gets catalogued in Gelman and the Library of Congress right alongside the ULR.
What does writing for the ULR or the GW Justice Journal get you, you ask? For one thing, you get to put a “Publications” section on your resume, which makes you feel like a BOSS. For another, you get to give prospective employers and internship bosses a glimpse into how you think about critical issues as well as your research and writing skills. From personal experience, writing for the Law Review and the Justice Journal helped start conversations at my summer job, got me internships last semester and next semester, and makes law school admissions officers’ ears perk up.
If you’d like to get any more information about either of the PLSA’s publications, or about joining the PLSA in general, please don’t hesitate to reach out to me at zsanders@gwmail.gwu.edu. I love talking about the Pre-Law opportunities we have here on campus, of which the PLSA publications are only a very small part.

Tell Your Friends: Apply to the UHP!

Freshmen in their second semester at GW are invited to apply to join the Honors Program.  The deadline is January 27, 2017.
Students accepted will enter the program their sophomore year and jump-start with a specially designed course in fall 2017. If you’d like to be part of the University Honors Program, please apply!
If you’re already in the UHP — we know you’ve got friends that would be perfect for the UHP, so encourage them to apply!
More details below; find the application here.

Please come to an info session!
We’ll be holding information sessions for interested students to ask questions and hear from Honors advisors and current students! Join us on

  • Tuesday, January 17 at 5pm
  • Wednesday, January 18 at 5pm
  • Thursday, January 19 at 5pm

All sessions will be held in the Honors Program office at 714 21st Street NW. Just walk up the steps at the brick townhouse between Hall of Government and Lisner Auditorium.
When/where/how to apply?
Applications are available online.  Complete it and return it to the UHP Office at 714 21st Street NW by 5pm on January 27, 2017.
What are the requirements to apply?
The specific application materials are described in the application.  Second-semester freshmen with strong GPAs should apply — the UHP requires its students to maintain GPAs high enough so that it’s mathematically possible to graduate with a 3.4.  Please note that student schedules must allow for the student to take HONR 2016 Enlightenment East & West in fall 2017.
When are decisions announced?
We’ll notify applicants this semester, before registration in March.

2017 Strasser Writing Prize

The UHP is now accepting your entries for the 2017 Strasser Writing Prize!
The Strasser prize awards a grand prize of $100 and two runner-ups of $50 to the best papers written in any Honors course over the past year.  You can only enter one paper, so make sure it’s your best!
Submit your entry here after reading the full rules.  Please remember to remove your name from all pages of the paper. The file title must be “LastName_FirstName.” (.doc or .docx only.)
This year’s deadline for entries is Friday, February 3rd, 2017 by 5:00 PM.
The paper is already written!  All you have to do is submit it!

The Intern Files: EMILY's List

The following blog post was written by peer advisor Delaney, an ESIA sophomore studying international affairs. Learn more about Delaney here.
I have always been a fan of the planning. In high school, I had weekly plans but also a broader monthly plan. I loved agendas, and I still do. My mom’s go-to Christmas gift to me each year is a wall calendar. It felt natural then that before coming to college, I should have a plan for my future. This plan formed midway through my junior year of high school when I discovered my love of international affairs. My plan was to major in international affairs, do all things international affairs and pursue internships with international foci. Basically, I wanted to follow a straight and narrow path toward my intended career as a diplomat for the United States.
When it came time to pursue my first internship, I maintained this line of thinking. By summer, I had a running list of about seven internships I thought I wanted to apply to. I applied and was accepted to one, which I was relatively happy with. The organization was international, but the department I was placed in did not particularly interest me. Nevertheless, I accepted the offer.
Just a couple days after interviewing with this organization, I stumbled across another internship per the suggestion of a friend. The internship was with EMILY’s List which, after a bit of research, I discovered was a domestic organization that aimed to help elect pro-choice, Democratic women into office, with a particular focus on millennial women and women of color. I loved these goals, but the organization was domestic, not international, hence a deviation from my original plan. Despite my concerns, I applied and two weeks later was offered a position on their State and Local Campaigns team.
Don’t get me wrong—I love domestic politics. I had been following the election since before the primary. I was the girl in high school who was teased about her vocal political views. My Facebook is littered with political posts, and I geeked out so hard over this election. By no means was I uninterested in domestic politics; I simply had intended to pursue a career in the international arena.
I had to make a decision. Should I forgo the opportunity to intern with an international organization in a not-so-great department to work for a domestic organization I had just become interested in a couple weeks prior? Was I seriously considering deviating from my plan?
After talking with my mom, consulting with friends from school, and some one-sided conversations with my dogs, I decided to back out of my internship at the initial international organization and accept my offer at EMILY’s List.

The State and Local Campaigns Team (I am on the upper right).
The State and Local Campaigns Team (I am on the upper right).

This decision was undoubtedly one of the best I’ve made thus far in my collegiate career. I joined a group (/network/family) of well-connected, wildly intelligent and passionate woman who genuinely care about their work. I experienced this election year in a manner I never thought possibly. I gained skills I will use for the rest of my career, participated in meaningful work, and had so much fun doing it.
One of my favorite memories from my internship was traveling with staff members and interns to the suburbs of Virginia for the weekend to encourage people to vote on election day. I woke up at the crack of dawn and sat in a small van, all the while discussing the election, our intended careers, our backgrounds, and our hopes for the future of the country, sharing laughs and small life stories. While knocking on doors, I met so many kind and interesting people and was able to bond with my colleagues in a very new way. Ultimately, adjusting my life plan to allow for an internship outside of my original goal afforded me so many unique opportunities like this one.
Canvassing with some wonderful women and Ray, our tech support guy (featuring my awkward squat in the front)
Canvassing with some wonderful women and Ray, our tech support guy (featuring my awkward squat in the front)

As it turns out, deviating from your initial plan and trusting your gut, your mom and your dogs is often the best option out there. There has not been a day I have regretted diverging from my plan, and in fact doing so has opened doors to international careers I had not previously considered. My advice: don’t be afraid to pursue opportunities that force you to adjust your original plan. You never know what doors will open and what experiences you’ll gain as a result!
Part of the Fall 2016 Intern Class on election night.
Part of the Fall 2016 Intern Class on election night.

Gingerbread House Decorating Party

It can make the Kessel Run in less than 12 drummers drumming.
It can make the Kessel Run in less than 12 drummers drumming.

Gingerbread House Decorating Party in the Townhouse

Thursday, December 15 from 1-4 PM

By December 15th, you’re going to be waist deep in finals and in desperate need of some stress-busting. Trade in those textbooks and laptops for sugar icing and gumdrop buttons! Or just come and eat a lot of candy and hang out with your friends. We’ll see you in the Club Room!

Study Hours at the UHP

Good news!  You don’t have to fight for a spot to study in Gelman any longer!

fight-in-gelman
Finals are hard; we can help make studying easier.  The UHP townhouse will be open late for study hours this semester!

There’s plenty of space in the club room AND basement of the townhouse.  And to sweeten the deal, we’ll have snacks to power your brains as you think your way to a solid A.  That includes hot chocolate and coffee, btw (try to bring your own mug).
We’re staying open on weekends and late into the night to help you get through in one piece!
 
Come to UHP Study Hours in our Office!
Sunday, 12/11 12pm-10pm
Monday, 12/12 9am-10pm
Tuesday, 12/139am-5pm*, 7pm-10pm
Wednesday, 12/14 9am-10pm
Thursday, 12/15 9am-10pm
Friday, 12/16 9am-10pm
Saturday, 12/17 12-10pm
Sunday, 12/18 12-10pm
Monday, 12/19 9am-5pm
Tuesday, 12/20 9am-5pm
Wednesday, 12/21 9am-5pm
*The townhouse is closed during the Student Faculty Dinner

#Honors Problems: My First 20 Page Paper

The following blog post was written by peer advisor Richie Beck, a SEAS sophomore on the pre-med track studying biomedical engineering. To learn more about Richie, see his full bio here.

A 10 page paper is easy. Five pages single spaced, use a bunch of block quotes, restate that wonderful work of art that is your thesis about 30 times, and make lots and lots of paragraphs. Simple, done and easy. But 20 pages is a whole different monster.
What your second semester of Origins does is give you a research paper on a 20th Century topic that you think you’re an expert at. Little do you know that the papers you read – when you begin your research at a max of two weeks prior – just blow all your novice ideas out of the water.
Your professor gives you practically the entire semester to work on and with your early semester positivity, you give yourself this plan that will make this 20 page paper an achievable feat. In hindsight that first plan is always the best.
With two weeks to go before my paper was due, I began my research and I was on this philosophy high that could only resonate with fellow Honors kids. I had my preliminary research done so I gave myself a break because it was just smooth sailing. That break turned into a week of not doing anything and procrastinating until everyone else in the class was finishing their papers and I hadn’t even written a single, coherent sentence. With a few days left, and no confidence in my abilities at all.
Each day was longer and longer and my progress wasn’t what I had planned. I was getting worried. I accepted the fact that I had to pull an all-nighter in order to finish this paper. This is something I would never recommend. Gelman at 4 AM is indescribable and with your delirium at its peak, you are reflecting on the poorest of your choices and anxious about the work you are supposed to be doing.
Walking out of Gelman that morning was a big hit to the ole self esteem, but I felt accomplished after finishing that paper.
giphy
Handing that paper in was the greatest feeling I had at GW because that was my blood, sweat and so many tears into one long paper. It made me truly understand the need for time management and putting in your 100% from day 1 of the semester.
I got a 94 on that paper and yes it went on my fridge.