Alumna Uses the Skills She Learned at GW to Shape a More Participatory and Resilient Digital Democracy for Latino Communities

In honor of National Hispanic Heritage Month, we caught up with Roberta Braga, ESIA MA’17, founder and executive director of Digital Democracy Institute of the Americas.

GW: Tell us about what you are doing now and why it matters to you?

RB: I launched and today lead a non-partisan, non-profit organization called the Digital Democracy Institute of the Americas (DDIA). DDIA’s mission is to strengthen trust between Latino communities and democracy, and we do that by contributing to building a healthier Internet that reflects how people engage with information ecosystems. We harness public opinion and narrative research to understand how people engage with content on the Internet and how it affects the way they connect with democratic processes, institutions, and each other. We study what goes viral and draw lessons learned between countries and contexts. And we use our findings to help Latinos make sense of the digital onslaught of information and become more resilient to manipulation online.

The Internet is so borderless that we see the same behaviors and narratives being repeated in different country contexts, but don’t always realize that online harms can be pretty predictable. I want DDIA to be a part of making those lessons learned clearer and more accessible for people.

As a kid from Brazil growing up in Wisconsin, I always felt divided in my identity, like a spokesperson for a culture nobody around me could understand. Today, we should be seeing just how much connects us, because we are perpetually on our phones, tablets, or computers seeing posts from people from everywhere in the world. Yet what we actually see are the most divisive things, leading us to be starved for connection even when we are more connected than we’ve ever been before. My hope is that DDIA will help pull people out of that reality and contribute to building an information environment free of fear and repression, one that rewards connection, security, and fair participation in democracy.

GW: What drew you to GW and the Elliott School for your graduate studies?

RB: The joint master’s degree in Global Communication from the Elliott School and the School of Media and Public Affairs was one of the most unique programs I came across when researching grad programs. It perfectly combined so many aspects of what I was passionate about and interested in: diplomacy, communications, storytelling, governance, foreign policy, public relations. I also loved that the program was entirely at night and GW offered scholarships that would realistically make it possible for me to continue studying AND working. Having already been in the workforce for 3 years when I went back to school, that was something I deeply appreciated.

GW: How did the Elliott School influence your professional choices and successes?

RB: GW influenced my career in so many ways: 1) Being a graduate student in the program contributed to my being hired as an intern at the Atlantic Council’s Adrienne Arsht Latin America Center. 2) Between my time as an intern and my return to the Council in 2016, I got my first paid job in Washington, as a contractor for the Department of Homeland Security’s Student and Exchange Visitor Program. I got that job because Professor Paul Cox, who at the time taught the Formal Briefing Skills Class, was impressed by my work and saw an opportunity for me at the company where he worked (Dynamis). In other words, not only did GW position me to be eligible and competitive for internships and jobs in the city, its professors also directly contributed to helping me grow in my career.

Connections aside, in my role now I use what I learned in that Formal Briefing class at least four times per week. A huge part of my job is presenting on panels, briefing partners, doing media interviews, and leading roundtable discussions. Being a good briefer and a good public speaker is a rare thing, and it is hugely valuable. Every student at GW should take that class!

GW: Are there particular classes and professors who stand out in your mind? Who helped you on your career path?

RB: I loved every class I took as part of the Global Comms program, but one of the classes that most directly influenced the work I do now was Analysis for Public Diplomacy Professionals, taught at the time by Professor Thomas Miller (SMPA 6270). That class made me familiar with open source investigations and narrative analysis, and what I learned in that class is a big component of the work we do at DDIA now, including how to break down contesting narratives, how to analyze narrative strategy, how to use framing and critical discourse, and how to use and analyze metaphor. Breaking down each line of a news article to study bias is something I remember doing to this day. We do that every single week at DDIA, and teach it too!

GW: What would you say to current Elliott School students who want to make a positive difference in the world?

RB: The job market for people passionate about international affairs and public diplomacy is tough right now, but don’t be afraid to say yes to things that may not be directly related to what you think you want. Often times the opportunities that will get you where you want to be (if you happen to know…I still don’t!) are the most unconventional or unexpected. What will help you stand out (in addition to all of the great things you learned at GW) are your passion, curiosity, attention to detail, and great writing skills – essentially the soft power you bring to the table.

GW Senior Builds Alumni Connections While Making Post-Grad Plans

As Anna Ward explored her next steps after graduation, the GW senior turned to alumni for guidance and found a mentor in Tom Barry.

Authored by: Brook Endale

Full GW Today article.

Anna Ward, a senior at GW, connects via Zoom with alumnus Tom Barry.

When Anna Ward got her acceptance letter to George Washington University, she was determined to take advantage of the opportunities that come with attending a school in the heart of Washington, D.C.

Now, as Ward begins her senior year, she has already built a resume filled with diverse internships.

She is a public health major with a minor in business management and leadership. Since her degree offers a broad range of career possibilities, she has made sure to use her time at GW to explore the different industries and fields she could enter.

So far, Ward has interned with a consulting firm on a minority health contract with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, worked on Capitol Hill for former West Virginia Sen. Joe Manchin, interned with the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy through the White House Internship Program and interned at Cigna to explore the insurance side of the health care industry.

“I never thought about it in terms of, I need to build a resume,” Ward said. “I wanted to try on different hats and figure out what felt like a good fit.”

As she plans for life after graduation, in addition to finding internship opportunities, she’s also tapped into GW’s alumni network for career advice.

“When there’s a posting I’m interested in, I’ve kind of taken it upon myself to do a quick LinkedIn search and find alumni who work there or can give me advice,” Ward said. “When you reach out, they are so willing to be helpful. They want to help guide you through the process, and I’ve never had a negative experience with reaching out for mentorship or help with career advice.”

When Ward wanted guidance on breaking into consulting without a traditional business background, she did a Google search to find GW alumni who could offer advice. Her search led her to a GW Today article from 10 years ago featuring Tom Barry, B.A. ’15, who at the time was a senior landing a consulting role at Deloitte.

She looked Barry up on LinkedIn and saw that over the years, he had worked in a wide range of fields, from consulting to health care. “I was like, all right, this guy went on a really cool road. I just want to hear what he has to say,” Ward said.

Barry said he’s always glad to hear from current GW students who reach out to him for career advice. “When the students reach out, it’s kind of like a full-circle moment,” Barry said. “I’ve had great mentors in my life, I’ve always enjoyed giving that back.”

After their initial Zoom call, the two kept in touch regularly, and he’s been a valuable mentor to Ward.

“He’s been wonderful. Over the past summer, we checked in every week or so. He happened to be in D.C. one week, so we had a chance to get coffee and just talk about life and what’s next. It’s kind of blossomed into a great mentorship and resource for me,” Ward said.

Barry has not only offered advice but also helped her prepare for case interviews and expand her network by introducing her to other professionals in the consulting and health care industries.

Ward said figuring out plans after college can be stressful, but speaking with Barry, who started out in the Elliott School of International Affairs and eventually found his way into consulting and health care, showed her that the path forward doesn’t have to be linear.

“He’s definitely helped with reminding me that I don’t need to have it all figured out,” Ward said.

One of the biggest messages Barry hopes to impart to students is that you’re never going to be completely certain about the right next step after graduation, and that’s OK. What matters, he says, is being open to change, continuing to explore and making sure you’re doing something that feels meaningful.

It’s a mindset he’s followed in his own career. Throughout his professional journey, Barry has consistently sought out opportunities that challenged him to grow, even if that meant switching industries or stepping into unfamiliar roles. From consulting at Deloitte, Barry has gone on to work in roles spanning product development, IT transformation and now leads his own AI strategy consultancy.

“You don’t have to have it all figured out,” Barry said. “Even 10 years later, I’m still figuring it out. The important thing is to give yourself space to reflect and lean on people you trust, whether that’s parents, professors or friends, and not feel like you have to navigate everything alone. There’s a lot of noise out there, but being honest about your questions helps.”

That’s one of the biggest benefits of connecting with alumni networks, Barry said. It gives students access to real-world advice and offers alumni the chance to reflect, give back and stay connected to the GW community that helped shape them.

“Building those relationships is rewarding for everyone,” Barry said.

Ward said the kind of support alumni are willing to provide to students is part of what makes the GW community so special.

“I came to GW wanting to just make the most of the resources here,” she added. “Everyone jokes about those ‘#onlyatGW moments,’ but it’s so true. Only at GW can you have some of these experiences. I’m so grateful that I’ve had access to these kinds of opportunities.”

Student Spotlight: A Conversation with Elliott School’s Van Helwin Igiraneza

Burundi’s Youth Voice at the UN

Van Helwin headshot

Meet Van Helwin Igiraneza, a first-year student at the Elliott School and the appointed representative of Burundian youth to the United Nations. Burundi is a small, landlocked country in East Africa, bordered by Rwanda, Tanzania, and the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). More than half of the 14.5 million Burundians are under the age of 18.

As youth ambassador to the UN, Igiraneza focuses on issues such as conflicts in the DRC and in Rwanda, particularly instability due to rebel activity that affects his home country. Of special concern: rebel groups in Goma, a city in the DRC, are increasingly and forcibly pressing young Burundi citizens into military service. 

 “We are concerned about the young people who are dying, and as a country, we will take action in order to protect those individuals,” said Igiraneza.

Asked how he came to be appointed to his UN position, Igiraneza explained that he had started by joining youth organizations in Burundi, then became youth representative for the diaspora community. “Through these activities, I was selected by the Burundi government to serve as my country’s UN youth ambassador. This means I speak out for the youth of the country on behalf of the government.”

At GW’s Elliott School, as Igiraneza embarks on his formal study of international affairs, he is eager to get to know his fellow GW students—and has been surprised that cultural differences have made connecting with peers challenging. “Everyone at GW seems constantly on the move!” he said. He contrasts this to Burundi’s more communal culture. “In Burundi, knowing everyone is the norm. That is our heritage, you know, knowing everyone.”

Igiraneza’s determination to help the young people of Burundi is inspiring. Already a diplomat in training, he is enthusiastic about sharing his passion and experiences with the GW community.

From DC to Rome: Exploring the Future of Economic Complexity

Javeria Ali headshot

Elliott alumna Javeria Ali, a trade research analyst at the Department of Commerce, marked a key transition from graduate studies to the next stage of her professional journey this past summer. Just weeks after earning her Master of Arts in International Affairs with a concentration in International Economic Policy from the Elliott School, Ali traveled to Rome, Italy, to attend the Economic Fitness and Complexity Summer School at the Enrico Fermi Research Center (CREF).

The program, jointly organized by CREF (Rome), UNU-MERIT (Maastricht), UNU-CRIS (Bruges), and the Young Scholar Initiative of the Institute of New Economic Thinking, brought together a global cohort of students, researchers, and practitioners to explore how complexity science can inform economic development, industrial policy, and sustainability.

For Ali, the timing was ideal. “After years of studying international trade and economic policy theory at Elliott, this program felt like the perfect way to apply what I’d learned to real-world issues,” she said.

The Summer School blended morning theory sessions with afternoon labs, where participants used coding and datasets in Python to model innovation networks, trace trade flows, and apply machine learning to growth patterns. Ali described the experience as both rigorous and rewarding. “It was challenging but exhilarating to transform abstract theories into tangible insights,” she reflected.

Workshops on network inference—using random graphs and multilayer networks—stood out to her for showing how industries and technologies interconnect, shaping resilience and opportunity. The week closed with group projects, tackling topics from labor markets to sustainability transitions.

Beyond technical work, participants engaged in wide-ranging discussions with academics. They debated on topics like how economies can shift toward green industries without leaving communities behind, the role of innovation in inclusive growth, and the spread of ideas globally.

“These conversations connected rigorous data analysis to the human stories behind global trade and development,” Ali said.

Rome’s historic backdrop added perspective after long days of coding and collaboration.

“Walking past ruins after a full day of data analysis made me realize how knowledge, like the city itself, is layered over time,” Ali said.

For Ali, the summer school was more than an academic program; it was a launchpad. It strengthened her technical skills, deepened her grasp of complexity science, and reinforced her commitment to linking theory with practice.

By summer’s end, the cohort of students who came from Europe, Asia, Africa, and the Americas had become friends. “This was more than a summer program—it was a chance to connect with a global community of thinkers,” she said.

GSS Summer In The City

Networking Made Easy

By Jeneva Pace

Employer Development Consultant, Graduate Student Services

GSS Summer In The City! Join us for summer fun!


“In leadership, having a great vision is only half the battle. The real magic happens when you can inspire others to walk alongside you, sharing both the challenges and triumphs of the journey. The most successful leaders aren’t just pathfinders—they’re people gatherers.” – Ian Meyer

During her first year at GW, Jeneva Pace, an employer development consultant at the Elliott School, listened to students’ concerns about the felt imperative to network and the accompanying dread. Pace wanted to find ways to help make networking more accessible. As she and colleagues at the Elliott School’s Graduate Student Services office (GSS) planned programs for the upcoming academic year, an initiative dubbed “Summer in the City—Let’s Network Together” was conceived, designed to teach networking skills in a low-pressure, fun environment.

As a recent transplant from Columbia, MO, to Washington, DC, Pace had been navigating her new and vibrant city. Like many students, she too found the excitement of discovering DC exhilarating but overwhelming at times. She knew how easy it is to feel lost.

Pace describes herself as “a people gatherer.” She says, “connecting with new individuals and building relationships energizes me. I genuinely love getting to know the students who seek career counseling.” She draws inspiration from Dave Novak, the co-founder and retired chairman and CEO of Yum! Brands, Inc., and the author of “Taking People With You.” His idea resonated with her: what if I could truly take people with me on this journey?

That’s how the idea for the “Summer in the City—Let’s Network Together” series was born. The initiative aims to combine networking, socializing, and Elliott students’ shared passion for international affairs, all while making friends in the process.

This summer GSS staff, students, and recent Elliott GSS grads attended seven events. Highlights included the Foreign Service Institute-Global Ties U.S. event, the Muslim Americans in Public Service Networking Night, and GSS’s Summer Networking Night, and was capped off with a social at The Bullpen before attending “GW Night” at the Nationals game. 

Through purposeful engagement capitalizing on international organizations’ existing social events, students improved their networking skills in low-pressure, fun environments, replacing the transactional feel with a sense of community. 

Faculty Reflections on COP26

COP26 logo and globe illustration
31 OCT – 12 NOV 2021
GLASGOW

COP26

ELLIOTT SCHOOL FACULTY REFLECTIONS

Earth Illustration

In 2018, U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres said, “Climate change is moving faster than we are.” The 26th United Nations Climate Change Conference of the Parties (COP26) taking place now— October 31 thru November 12— in Glasgow, Scotland, confirms Guterres’s statement. The earth is not on track to limit global warming to the 1.5º C agreed to in Paris at COP21.  The reality is that the number and severity of extreme weather events are overtaking efforts to reduce global warming. The countries participating in COP26 were asked to lay out their 2030 emissions reductions targets (NDCs) that align with reaching the net zero greenhouse gas emissions goal by 2050, as well as a commitment from developed countries to raise $100 billion dollars in climate finance to offset the damage to the world’s ecosystems and build infrastructure resiliency.

Elliott School faculty from a variety of disciplines weighed in on COP26 topics from the unintended consequences of carbon offsets, to whether nuclear energy has a role to play in slowing carbon based emissions, to a call to reframe the current cynicism around the efficacy of large climate conferences like this one, and the need for financial support for affected nations experiencing the deadly effects of climate change.

Marcus DuBois King

The COP 26 meeting in Glasgow is the first opportunity since the signing of the Paris Accord in 2015 for signatories to revisit voluntary greenhouse gas emissions targets. As they enter into the second week of negotiations, these countries are not on track to meet the...

read more

Stephen C. Smith

Environmental deterioration is probably the most important global development challenge. Climate change is harming many of the world’s poorest people; and far worse impact is already unavoidable; achieving effective resilience and adaptation is growing in urgency....

read more

Moses Kansanga

Over the past decade, the world has made bold climate change mitigation and adaptation commitments, with the Paris Agreement seen as a landmark development in this collective struggle. COP26 is yet another celebrated gathering of stakeholders aimed at providing...

read more

Sharon Squassoni

Activists and governments alike approached the 2021 Glasgow climate change conference – known as COP26 – knowing that bold action would be needed to avoid the worst effects of a warming world.  Is nuclear energy the answer?  Nuclear energy is a low-carbon...

read more

Nina Kelsey

Climate politics invite cynicism. The longer I follow them, the more I notice how certain narratives recur: UN officials and environmental advocacy groups declare that this meeting is the final chance to avert catastrophe. Big nations make lofty statements, followed...

read more

Marcus DuBois King

The COP 26 meeting in Glasgow is the first opportunity since the signing of the Paris Accord in 2015 for signatories to revisit voluntary greenhouse gas emissions targets. As they enter into the second week of negotiations, these countries are not on track to meet the most ambitious goal of emissions reductions that would keep the planet to 1.5ºC or 2.7ºF warming compared to preindustrial levels. With this goal potentially out of reach, they should also turn attention toward addressing two important issues for those nations most affected by climate change’s ravages, climate finance and loss and damages. It is vital that negotiations toward new financial support for climate adaptation and new mechanisms for compensating impacted nations are successful. If so, then negotiators at COP 26 can still make meaningful progress toward dealing with the worst impacts of the climate crisis.

Marcus DuBois King
Director, Master of Arts in International Affairs
John O. Rankin Associate Professor

Stephen C. Smith

Environmental deterioration is probably the most important global development challenge. Climate change is harming many of the world’s poorest people; and far worse impact is already unavoidable; achieving effective resilience and adaptation is growing in urgency. Southern Madagascar is facing the “first famine driven entirely by climate change.” At COP26, various country coalitions have announced initial agreements, notably to stop funding overseas coal plants; reach international assistance targets; cut methane emissions by 30%; and stop forest destruction this decade. The scale and reliability of many commitments were doubted, but the extent of pessimism seems unwarranted.  What has been accomplished so far is partial, but it is significant. Going forward, wider solutions need financing; and while climate mitigation and adaptation financing mechanisms have been established, they face daunting problems: we need better data and better projects; and better implementation, monitoring, and evaluation. Even doing that, as a Dec. 2020 UN survey report argued, the almost-achieved $100 billion annual assistance target will need to become a floor, not a ceiling.  Still, we must keep in mind that there is indeed room for optimism – for the results of COP26, but more importantly for the years of work ahead.

Stephen C. Smith
Professor and Chair, Department of Economics

Moses Kansanga

Over the past decade, the world has made bold climate change mitigation and adaptation commitments, with the Paris Agreement seen as a landmark development in this collective struggle. COP26 is yet another celebrated gathering of stakeholders aimed at providing momentum to accelerate action towards the goals of the Paris Accords. This anticipated momentum is timely, given the socioeconomic toll of Covid-19 on the global economy. The extra urgency from the pandemic is expressed in the remarks of the President Designate of the COP that this year’s convention cannot be another ‘talking show’ but an opportunity to build back stronger, better, and greener. While we so much seek and need to accelerate our collective fight to limit global warming to 1.5 °C relative to pre-industrial levels, it is also crucial to reflect on the [un]intended outcomes of this journey so far. A critical area to reflect upon is the growing reliance on carbon offsetting as a climate mitigation tool and its impacts on marginalized communities in tropical countries in the Global South which are now hotspots for building forest carbon stocks. While offset programs such as REDD+ are dubbed instrumental in carbon sequestration, they are linked to widespread farmer displacement in the Global South, especially in communities where customary land tenure practices prevail. Under customary tenure regimes where farmers typically have user rights to land held in trust for them by traditional custodians, attempts by the state and private corporations to secure forests for REDD+ often result in militarized forest enclosures with little opportunity for weaker groups to continue to access forest resources. While industrialized countries rely on carbon credits from these offset programs to meet considerable portions of their nationally determined emission reduction targets, payments rarely trickle down to local communities. Unfortunately, these marginalized smallholder farmers are those impacted the most by climate change. From research in forest communities, I have come to realize that these dynamics of displacement and enclosure make carbon forest programs counterproductive because when local livelihoods are not properly integrated, forest conservation in a given geography merely leads to a displacement of deforestation to other geographies. If global scale climate change efforts, including collective decisions from COP26 are to be meaningful, we must pay attention to these micro-scale [un]intended livelihood impacts.

Moses Kansanga
Assistant Professor of Geography and International Affairs

Sharon Squassoni

Activists and governments alike approached the 2021 Glasgow climate change conference – known as COP26 – knowing that bold action would be needed to avoid the worst effects of a warming world.  Is nuclear energy the answer?  Nuclear energy is a low-carbon source of electricity and the industry is looking to expand to new applications (like hydrogen production) and new countries.  Only 32 countries now deploy nuclear energy, supplying 10% of the world’s electricity generation.  Nuclear energy’s market share of electricity production has been declining for a few decades – it has not been able to surmount long-standing cost, safety, waste and nuclear weapons proliferation challenges.  Next-generation reactors promise a lot but so far have not delivered.  Perhaps most importantly, the world may not have enough time to “do nuclear right” if we hope to keep global warming to 1.5 degrees.  

Sharon Squassoni
Research Professor of the Practice of International Affairs