• Case Recommendations
  • Attending Arguments
    • Overview
    • Online Access
  • Online Access
  • About
  • Courses
  • Publications

Prof. Zachary Wolfe, Esq.

University Writing Program, George Washington University | all content & perspectives are my own

  • Case Recommendations
  • Attending Arguments
    • Overview
    • Online Access
  • Online Access
  • About
  • Courses
  • Publications

Decision days

June 9, 2020 case suggestions

There are 3 more decision days scheduled in this term (on Mondays until the end of June) and about 18 decisions still to come (depending on whether consolidated and similar cases get one or multiple decisions, and whether some cases get resolved without a decision).  Amy Howe has a handy list of all the unresolved cases, organized by argument date and with some information about most likely author when available. It’s possible that the Court will extend its usual term and issue decisions into July, but that seems unlikely.

Decision days used to be attended by court-watchers and people who wanted to be there for an historic moment when a decision came down in a major case. There were smaller lines to get into the courtroom compared to argument days.  The Justices would take the bench and announce the decisions, and sometimes a dissenter would make a statement as well. It could be a really meaningful experience.  But because of COVID-19 concerns, the Court is not taking the bench this month.  Instead, orders are released on its website and to the press — one-by-one, spaced out by 10 minutes.  Scotusblog.com offers a live-blog starting at 10:00, quickly reacting to each decision when it is released.

There is something of a history of decisions in cases involving sexual orientation being released on June 26, at least when it involves an expansion of rights.  That was true for Lawrence v. Texas back in 2003 (striking down sodomy laws) and the marriage equality cases in both 2013 and 2015 (even though the 26th in those years did not fall on a Monday, the usual day for decision announcements), while the fractured Masterpiece Cakeshop decision was released June 4, 2018.  For this term, the cases involving whether Title VII prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity were argued back in October and are the only cases from October that have not yet been resolved. And the next-oldest cases involve the rescission of DACA.  Everything else argued in 2019 has been resolved.  So it may well be that the Court won’t issue decisions in these controversial cases until the last-scheduled decision day on June 29 or a yet to be announced decision day on Friday the 26th.

There are several important and interesting cases still to be resolved beyond the Title VII cases above, but I’ll highlight just three more and recommend Howe’s page (linked above) for details on the others.  June Medical Services (the Louisiana abortion law) was argued in March.  Little Sisters of the Poor (the Affordable Care Act’s “birth-control mandate”) was argued in the first week of May.  And the cases involving subpoena’s for Trump’s tax and financial records weren’t argued until May 12, the second to last day of oral arguments this term.

Share this post:

Share on X (Twitter) Share on Facebook Share on Email Share on SMS

Live streaming

About that one Gorsuch opinion....

Find me on the Fediverse (Mastodon)

  • @profzwolfe@esq.social
Subscribe by Email

Completely spam free, opt out any time.

Please, insert a valid email.

Thank you, your email will be added to the mailing list once you click on the link in the confirmation email.

Spam protection has stopped this request. Please contact site owner for help.

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Subject Tags

4th amendment abortion ADA administrative law arbitration arbitration agreements bivens census cfpb clean water act climate change criminal law DACA death penalty discrimination disparate impact domestic violence EEOC employment discrimination epa Fair Housing Act first amendment first step act free speech fsia gerrymandering gun control immigration immigration law individuals with disabilities education act jury trial lgbt discrimination marriage equality no-fly oral arguments racial gerrymandering religion scotus second amendment Supreme Court title vii trademark union voting rights whistleblower protection

Recent Posts

  • January 2026 arguments
  • October 2025 cases
  • Know Your Rights – Washington, DC
  • October 2025 term – lottery opens
  • Thoughts on LA and the differences between power and authority

Categories

  • case suggestions
  • commentary
  • Uncategorized

Archives

  • January 2026
  • August 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • August 2024
  • April 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • August 2023
  • June 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • October 2022
  • August 2022
  • May 2022
  • February 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • August 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • November 2020
  • September 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • November 2019
  • August 2019
  • April 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • August 2017
  • April 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • September 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • September 2015
  • June 2015
  • April 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • October 2014
  • September 2014

Recent Comments

  1. zwolfe on Attending Arguments
  2. Gene Hayward on Attending Arguments
  3. zwolfe on Attending Arguments
  4. Richard Poppen on Attending Arguments
  5. Karya Bintang Abadi on January 2025 Cases
Log in
Proudly powered by WordPress | Theme: Doo by ThemeVS.
Unless otherwise indicated, the content and opinions expressed on this web site are those of the author(s). They are not endorsed by and do not necessarily reflect the views of the George Washington University.
Viewing Message: 1 of 1.
Notice

This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. Visit GW’s Website Privacy Notice to learn more about how GW uses cookies.