Skip to content

Ameer Khalek

September 6, 2016

A key indicator of emergency department (ED) performance is length of stay (LOS), or how long a patient remains in the ED from the time they arrive until departure. Literature supports that adverse outcomes, decreased patient satisfaction, and ED crowding are concomitants of prolonged ED LOS. In the latest issue of The American Journal of Emergency Medicine, Dr. Shou-Yen Chen et al. discusses factors associated with prolonged ED LOS, focusing on mass casualty incidents (MCI).

A MCI is declared under any circumstance where the number of casualties exceeds the amount of available resources. Not too long ago, I participated as EMS Command in a planned active shooter drill on GW’s campus and experienced firsthand what a MCI might look like.  After this experience, I remained curious about how EMS triage and initiation of treatment translated to ED care in a MCI.

Dr. Chen’s study enrolled patients who were treated for the burn injuries during a MCI at Formosa Fun Water Park. The study identified various patient characteristics correlated to one of three Triage Levels (I – emergent, II – urgent, III – less urgent), and described for each of these groups the management in ED, registration before/after hospital MCI response activation, % total body surface area (TBSA) of partial or full thickness burns, etc. The number of patients stratified by triage levels was I: 14, II: 19, and III: 15.

Once the MCI response was activated at the receiving facility, researchers did not find a significant association between patient load and ED LOS. Interestingly enough, Dr. Chen’s examination of three phases following transfer of care from pre-hospital personnel revealed that (1) input and (2) throughput were solely based on the readiness of ED staff. However, (3) output was co-dependent upon the continuum of care – specifically the downstream availability of beds –  and scale of MCI response. According to the study, “the output time interval remained prolonged even after opening [a] reserved unit because of limited staff… identifying a cutoff value within the output time interval might be useful to determine the timing of reallocation of personnel/resources.” When efforts to continue advanced resuscitation warrant quick disposition, such as the intensive care unit, the resource-availability to manage that burden is the key aspect of decreasing ED LOS. Considering more than the capabilities of the receiving facility examined in the study, the approach applies to shortening all ED LOS under resource-constrained circumstances.

An earlier study by Dr. Asher Hirshberg et al. found that the concept of minimal acceptable care was the key to a staged management approach during an MCI. He also found that variable surge capacity was dependent on the rate of patient arrival, as opposed to the availability of beds. Therefore, the importance of recognition and initiation of MCI protocols is paramount for reducing crowding and maintaining a quality of care in the ED.

 


Ameer Khalek is a MPH student at the GWU Milken Institute School of Public Health

Ameer Khalek

August 10, 2016

Emergency Medical Technicians are trained to assess patient signs and symptoms and deliver specific, protocol-based treatments in the pre-hospital setting. While EMTs are not trained as diagnosticians, one common presentation we are trained to recognize and treat is hypoglycemia, or a low blood glucose level. Testing for hypoglycemia by EMTs in the field involves sampling blood – commonly through a finger prick – and testing the blood glucose level with a glucometer device. This approach to bedside sampling of blood where the result is available immediately is called point-of-care testing (POCT). POCT for blood glucose is very accurate with a specificity of 99.3%.  When patients have hypoglycemia, we as EMTs can often address the problem by administering sugar solutions or intravenous dextrose. However, beyond POCT for blood glucose, there are other ways that EMTs can use POCT to help patients. Below I describe several studies where EMS personnel have used additional POCT in useful ways.

A study by Guerra et al. examined the feasibility of EMS personnel recognizing an acute sepsis patient using venous lactate measures. Their study found that although there was a lack of EMS education on sepsis identification, mortality from severe sepsis decreased from 26.7% to 13.6% after the implementation of the protocol. While the reported treatment effect seems unfeasibly large, the authors concluded that by having a Sepsis Alert Protocol in place, both EMS and the ED personnel were able to initiate treatment in the early phases of illness.  Sepsis is a time-sensitive disease where earlier resuscitation and care can improve outcomes.

Another study by Venturini et al. examined the reliability of pre-hospital POCT for troponin levels, which can be useful to detect acute heart damage during heart attacks. They found no significant difference in whole-blood troponin results between those performed in the ED and in the moving ambulance (p <0.005). Immediate access to troponin results can aid in the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (specifically without ST-elevation). Stengaard et al. also predicts that pre-hospital POCT will be central in pre-hospital heart attack care in the near future.

Beynon et al. used pre-hospital POCT to examine whether the pre-hospital physician assessment of hemostatic parameters is feasible. Point-of-care INR testing was performed on a total of 103 patients, revealing a pre-hospital sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 98.7% for detecting coagulopathy. Furthermore, the median time saved through POCT compared to results being sent to a central lab upon transfer of care was 69 minutes (ranging from 33 to 336min) – substantially beneficial for patients with intracranial hemorrhage.

From the results of these studies, we see that POCT in the pre-hospital setting seems to be reliable, valid, and in many cases helpful to clinical care. Along with pre-hospital initiation of care, information relayed to a receiving facility can allow for the mobilization of resources to improve timely access to definitive care. As medicine moves from volume to value, there are many ways that EMS can contribute to a higher-value healthcare system. POCT is one, important way that is feasible and effective, but will require further EMS education and protocol development prior to widespread implementation.


Ameer Khalek is a MPH student at the GWU Milken Institute School of Public Health