New paper published on radiative corrections in super-Rosenbluth experiments

Our group’s latest result is a paper published in the European Physical Journal A on radiative corrections for specific type of electron-proton scattering experiment, called a Super Rosenbluth experiment. Elastic electron-proton scattering experiments are useful for learning about how the charge and magnetism of a proton are distributed within its volume. At low electron beam energies, it makes sense for the experiment to detect the scattered electron, since very little energy is transferred to the proton, since it is comparatively heavy. At higher beam energies, there is a significant “kick” given to the proton, and experiments can be conducted in which the electron and proton are detected at the same time, that is, in coincidence. In a super-Rosenbluth experiment, only the kicked proton is detected. Proponents of this technique have claimed many benefits, one of which is the supposed reduction in complexity of radiative corrections.

To test this, we simulated traditional electron detection and super-Rosenbluth experiments using two different radiative corrections models. The first model employed the peaking approximation, an approximation that charged particles will only radiate energy in their direction of motion. The second model did not make this approximation. We found that when using the peaking approximation, radiative corrections were indeed smaller and less kinematically-dependent when performing a super-Rosenbluth experiment.

Graph showing radiative correction factors as a function of virtual photon polarzation, epsilon, for simulated electron-detection measurements.
Graph showing radiative correction factors as a function of virtual photon polarzation, epsilon, for simulated super-Rosenbluth measurements.

By contrast, when using a model that avoided the peaking approximation, radiative corrections were significantly larger.

Radiative tail simulated for a super-Rosenbluth experiment, using a model that avoided the peaking approximation. The tail is larger and more numerically unstable than when using the peaking approximation. The effect went away when eliminating radiation from the proton. (Figure by Quinn Stefan)

We were able identify that the larger radiative tail was caused by radiation from the proton, rather than from the electron. Specifically, if the proton were to radiate a photon in the direction of an elastically scattered electron, there could be a large enhancement in cross section.

This reaction is not modeled in the peaking approximation. For that reason, we conclude that the peaking approximation is dubious for super-Rosenbluth experiments.

Undergraduate Quinn Stefan began working on this project as part of her Luther Rice fellowship in 2023.

New paper updating the SAID Partial-Wave Analysis Global Fits

In a recent paper in Physical Review C, our group, in collaboration with GW professor Ron Workman and with Prof. Alfred Svarc from the Rudjer Boškovic Institute in Zagreb, Croatia, describe the latest release version of SAID partial wave analysis global fits. SAID consists of a data base of over 10,000 scattering measurements in a variety of observables and channels, as well as a simultaneous multi-channel partial wave analysis global fit, which allows predictions of the complete set of observables. In this paper, we have used the updated fits to produce revised estimates of the helicity amplitudes of light baryonic resonances. An example of data and the resulting fit for one observable (differential cross section) for one channel (gamma p –> π0 p) for one beam energy (E=1625 MeV) are shown below. One motivation for this update was the publication of the E double spin asymmetry results in the “gamma p –> π0 p” reaction that made up Chan Kim’s PhD thesis.

An example figure from the paper showing the differential cross section for the gamma p –> π0 p channel at a photon beam energy of 1625 MeV. World data are shown in blue points. The new SAID fit results are shown with the red solid curve, while other less recent global fits (SAID 2012 in blue, MAID 2007 in green, Bonn-Gatchina 2019 in magenta) are shown for comparison.