I'm not sure I'd put this in the same celebratory category as a new year's event (January 29 is Vietnamese new year and Chinese new year for 2025), but it is noteworthy. WHO publicizes this day, and it might surprise some in the US that we had 369 new US cases detected in 2023, including 4 children. Here's a global map:
Leprosy still is one of the most stigmatized diseases in the world, fed by rumor and superstition. WHO is a good source for factual information. Speaking of WHO ...
US Quits WHO - What Does This Mean?
Well, this executive order doesn't mean anything immediately, assuming the new administration doesn't somehow violate the agreement for giving a year's notice to WHO before leaving. The US is obligated to pay for 2025. I have no direct experience with WHO, but it is well-known to be a large bureaucracy with the usual ponderous systems that this brings. I did find some better information from one of the many information sources I read, this one written by epidemiologist Dr. Katelyn Jetelina. She previously worked at WHO in Geneva, and her January 23 post provides more insight into how the loss of US funding for WHO might impact world health. She documents many problems with the WHO, but also provides a stark look at what the loss of US funds could portend. The US is the largest donor to WHO.
I'm hoping cooler heads will prevail and this exit won't go through.
MMWR Disappears
I've been subscribing to CDC's Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report for more than 40 years, way back to when the paper copy came to me in snail mail every week. The communications embargo for health information, detailed in a memo by the acting Secretary for HHS, put a hold until February 1 on federal agencies issuing any information that hasn't been reviewed by a presidential appointee. The memo does allow for exceptions that include critical information, again requiring some sort of political appointee approval.
The MMWR isn't particularly controversial in my mind. I read it every week, but I suspect most healthcare providers don't keep it on their nightstands, or whatever that equivalent is in today's digital world. As of now, the current issue is listed as January 16, with nothing about a January 23 edition. Presumably we will miss January 30 as well.
I'm not so worried about this now, I'm sure we'd hear if we need to take any urgent action with bird flu or other emergency, but I am concerned about whether political censorship will affect the credibility of this information in the long run. I can still remember the chaos early in 2020 and the insistence by some of the value of hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, and even bleach as effective treatments.
And, speaking of avian flu ...
Avian Flu Update (without CDC)
The Infectious Diseases Society of America broadcast a bird flu webinar, usually done in conjunction with CDC, but this time CDC wasn't mentioned in the title and none of the speakers had CDC appointments. I was able to attend the session in its entirety, and the recording and slides are available to everyone. In spite of the official CDC absence, the speakers were bona fide experts, and I learned several things.
The molecular difference between highly pathogenic avian influenza and low (not lowly) pathogenic strains (slide 6):
Recent global spread of HPAI by wild birds (slide 11):
Spread to dairy cows facilitated by excellent replication in mammary glands and transmission among cows mainly via milking machines (slide 16):
Experience in California suggests that conjunctival swabs may have higher yield of H5N1 than nasopharyngeal swabs (slide 37):
Remember that conjunctivitis is common (80%) in current human cases of H5N1 but is not a prominent feature of seasonal influenza.
Sequencing of strains from human cases in California suggest that the human cases arose by independent cattle-to-human infection events (slide 40), explained by the red dots below appearing in separate phylogenetic trees:
Also some discussion ensued about various testing options. The short version is that none of the tests are approved for conjunctival specimens, and the sensitivity of various tests to identify influenza A H5 is uncertain. Also unknown is whether testing costs in commercial labs would be covered by various insurance plans.
The penultimate presentation was by Bethany Boggess Alcauter, PhD, from the National Center for Farmworker Health. She provided a unique perspective that enlightened me greatly. It starts with slide 72. It was very clear that farmworkers have difficult jobs with little labor protections (below is slides 75-78):
One can easily imagine how tough it is to monitor and manage infections in these workers who now have the added burden of being more targeted for deportation.
A final presentation by Dr. Richard Webby from St. Jude Children's Research Hospital summed up in slides 86 and 87 the current understanding of H5N1 evolution and how difficult it will be to predict the future:
Antibiotics Can't Beat Cold Steel for Appendicitis
Moving away from various pandemic and political concerns for a moment, a new randomized controlled trial suggests that medical therapy alone is inferior to appendectomy (aka appendicectomy in the article) for management of uncomplicated appendicitis in children 5-16 years of age. This was a multinational study at 11 sites (2 in the US) that enrolled a little over 900 children with suspected non-perforated appendicitis.
Prior studies have suggested antibiotic therapy alone is an acceptable management pathway, and I suspect we haven't heard the last on this issue. For now I'd go with surgical intervention as the better alternative.
WRIS
With the muzzle on federal authorities releasing new data, I was interested to see what my usual information sites had available to me this week to monitor winter respiratory viral infection activity. I'm happy to report that the CDC's Respiratory Illnesses Data Channel was updated on Friday as per usual.
The NREVSS Dashboard also was updated (the cutoff date is January 17, but this diagram has additional data compared to last week's report).
I'm not subscribing to any crystal ball methods for predicting how WRIS will progress; I've seen some intimations that covid will be mild this winter, but I worry that some folks are trying to fit covid into a seasonal virus pattern which so far we've learned is not true.
Any bets on whether we'll see MMWR this week?
Happy Year of the Snake! Sức khỏe dồi dào