Skip to content

Obstinacy or Ignorance or Fear

Those words written by a famous children's author in 1988 remain relevant today; details to follow after a few mentions of other pediatric infectious disease news from the past week.

Covid Serology Update

The Infectious Disease Society of American updated their guidelines for use of covid serology testing. It is the 4th update since the pandemic began, but there isn't much new here. Currently over 95% of the US population has evidence of immunity either from natural infection, vaccination, or both. Serologic testing of individuals mostly is discouraged because it won't provide any useful clinical information to manage an individual's situation. About the only use might be to check immunity in immunocompromised individuals to help decide if immunotherapy could be warranted for prophylaxis or for treatment of active infection.

Covid in Young Infants

Early in the pandemic, most very young infants diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection were hospitalized. This was due to a combination of the usual practice for febrile infants less than 1 month of age as well as the uncertainty of infection outcomes in this age group. I recall from my clinical experiences that it appeared that most young infants actually did well, though there were exceptions. Finally we have a study that gives us some more detailed data about young infants early in the pandemic. It is a secondary analysis of a prospective global study that recruited children presenting to pediatric emergency departments with illness and tested for covid. The study design allows for much more detail (and presumably more validity) than the other designs such as review of administrative data. The study (actually 2 studies combined) enrolled between March 2020 and February 2022. They ended up with 432 children testing positive for covid to compare with 616 testing negative. Clinical outcomes were generally more severe in the SARS-CoV-2-negative infants:

So, at least early in the pandemic, young infants with SARS-CoV-2 infection fared pretty well.

A Colorful Variant Update

Nothing new about this, but I admit to a strange attraction to colorful covid variant charts. I thought it was interesting to look back to see how the JN.1 variant progressed in the US.

The JN.1 shade of purple has been called "indigo purple" (hex #660999).

Varicella Misdiagnosis

A new CDC report suggests clinicians aren't too skilled in diagnosing varicella infections, perhaps because it is now much less common due to effective vaccination. The Minnesota Department of Health looked at suspected varicella cases from 2016 to 2023, a time when they implemented a new system for processing PCR testing of lesions. Of 208 suspected varicella cases, only 45% had positive tests; in vaccinated patients, the number dropped to 22%. They attributed this to unreliability of clinical diagnosis of varicella, especially in vaccinated patients, but I suspect other factors (improper specimen collection technique, testing unlikely varicella patients "just to be sure") may be contributory as well. Anecdotally I've certainly noticed how difficult the diagnosis varicella-zoster virus infection can be for younger clinicians who don't have the experience of seeing multiple cases in the pre-vaccine era.

Speaking of Misdiagnosis ...

I'm in my broken record mode again here. In case you've been hibernating or torporing, we're in the midst of a global measles surge. I read with alarm of a measles vaccine shortage in Canada. There are no signs of a similar shortage in the US; you can always check on US vaccine shortages at this CDC site. With spring break upon us now, and summer travels coming up, all of us need to brush up on measles diagnosis. Thankfully we have a lot of help.

Last Sunday, the CDC issued a Health Alert Network post with a number of useful links. The American Academy of Pediatrics provides a one-pager with great advice as well as a 5-minute video. Another source I've found very useful for years is from a now out-of-print textbook, Krugman's Infectious Diseases of Children. When I discovered libraries no longer carried it, I tracked down a used copy of the 10th edition (1998) released by a university library and have made continued good use of their black and white diagrams. Here's the clinical progression of illness, the key highlight here is the prodrome of a few days before the rash appears. This is very helpful in suspecting a measles diagnosis because the prolonged prodrome is very unusual in pediatric infectious exanthems.

Also useful is the development and distribution of the rash:

I failed to find a current global measles map so return to the CDC website to at least give a current view of US measles cases. For this calendar year we are now up to 64 cases spread over 17 jurisdictions.

Many clinicians may not remember that, though the first measles vaccine was approved for use in the US in 1961, it wasn't until 30 years later that a second dose was recommended. That was spurred by cases in the late 1980s appearing in vaccinated school children, the first major sign that a single dose wasn't sufficient to prevent outbreaks. That second dose was first recommended for 11-12 year olds by the AAP, subsequently dropped to the 4-6 year age group in 1997 to come into agreement with the CDC. Importantly, the interval between the 2 doses can be as short as 28 days for MMR and 90 days for MMRV vaccines, and early vaccination down to 6 months of age is indicated in special circumstances, such as for children who will be traveling internationally. Frontline pediatric providers need to be proactive in alerting parents planning international travel to ensure that their children ages 6 months and older are protected. Scroll down to the Special Situations section on the CDC immunization schedule notes.

Roald Dahl

I learned just recently that this famed children's book author lost a daughter to measles in 1962. He wrote 25 years later, "Olivia, my eldest daughter, caught measles when she was seven years old. As the illness took its usual course I can remember reading to her often in bed and not feeling particularly alarmed about it. Then one morning, when she was well on the road to recovery, I was sitting on her bed showing her how to fashion little animals out of coloured pipe-cleaners, and when it came to her turn to make one herself, I noticed that her fingers and her mind were not working together and she couldn’t do anything. 'Are you feeling all right?' I asked her. 'I feel all sleepy,' she said. In an hour, she was unconscious. In twelve hours she was dead.”

She had developed measles encephalitis. He wrote this in the late 1980s to encourage parents in the United Kingdom to accept a new MMR vaccine for their children (monovalent measles vaccine had been introduced in 1968 in the UK). He also wrote, “In my opinion parents who now refuse to have their children immunised are putting the lives of those children at risk. In America, where measles immunisation is compulsory, measles, like smallpox, has been virtually wiped out. Here in Britain, because so many parents refuse, either out of obstinacy or ignorance or fear, to allow their children to be immunised, we still have a hundred thousand cases of measles every year.”

Much has been written about Dahl's dark side (e.g. "an equal-opportunity bigot"), but I give him credit for trying to help children and their parents avoid the misfortune he and his family experienced.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *